2014Zhongguo jiceng yiyaoRequires access

Comparison of laparoscopic assisted small incision in the neck surgery and traditional open surgical treatment of benign thyroid

田洪森, 高祀岩

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the neck incision laparoscopic assisted surgery and conventional open surgical treatment of thyroid benign clinical efficacy,and explore the small incision endoscopic assisted neck safety and effectiveness.Methods According to a random number table,100 patients with benign thyroid were randomly divided into the control group and observation group,50 cases in each group.The patients in the observation group were underwent endoscopic assisted small incision neck surgery,and the patients in the control group of traditional open surgery.The efficacy of postoperative of the two groups was observed and compared.Results The operative time,hospitalization time,blood loss,drainage,drainage time of the observation group was (57.4 ±11.7)min,(3.2 ± 1.0)d,(9.4 ±5.2)mL,(21.4 ±13.5)mL,(1.7 ±0.8)d,which were better than those of the control group(t=8.577,6.352,17.563,12.970,6.273,all P〈0.05);The overall incidence of complications in the observation group after the treatment was 8%,which was significantly lower than 30% in the control group(χ2 =7.86,P〈0.05). Conclusion Endoscopic surgery assisted small incision in the neck benign thyroid is superior to traditional open sur-gery,and is a simple,effective and safe surgical approach.Compared to traditional open surgery,it has better cosmetic results,which is worthy of clinical application. Key words: Surgical Procedures; Minimally Invasive Thyroid Neoplasms

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the neck incision laparoscopic assisted surgery and conventional open surgical treatment of thyroid benign clinical efficacy,and explore the small incision endoscopic assisted neck safety and effectiveness.Methods According to a random number table,100 patients with benign thyroid were randomly divided into the control group and observation group,50 cases in each group.The patients in the observation group were underwent endoscopic assisted small incision neck surgery,and the patients in the control group of traditional open surgery.The efficacy of postoperative of the two groups was observed and compared.Results The operative time,hospitalization time,blood loss,drainage,drainage time of the observation group was (57.4 ±11.7)min,(3.2 ± 1.0)d,(9.4 ±5.2)mL,(21.4 ±13.5)mL,(1.7 ±0.8)d,which were better than those of the control group(t=8.577,6.352,17.563,12.970,6.273,all P〈0.05);The overall incidence of complications in the observation group after the treatment was 8%,which was significantly lower than 30% in the control group(χ2 =7.86,P〈0.05). Conclusion Endoscopic surgery assisted small incision in the neck benign thyroid is superior to traditional open sur-gery,and is a simple,effective and safe surgical approach.Compared to traditional open surgery,it has better cosmetic results,which is worthy of clinical application. Key words: Surgical Procedures; Minimally Invasive Thyroid Neoplasms

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the neck incision laparoscopic assisted surgery and conventional open surgical treatment of thyroid benign clinical efficacy,and explore the small incision endoscopic assisted neck safety and effectiveness.Methods According to a random number table,100 patients with benign thyroid were randomly divided into the control group and observation group,50 cases in each group.The patients in the observation group were underwent endoscopic assisted small incision neck surgery,and the patients in the control group of traditional open surgery.The efficacy of postoperative of the two groups was observed and compared.Results The operative time,hospitalization time,blood loss,drainage,drainage time of the observation group was (57.4 ±11.7)min,(3.2 ± 1.0)d,(9.4 ±5.2)mL,(21.4 ±13.5)mL,(1.7 ±0.8)d,which were better than those of the control group(t=8.577,6.352,17.563,12.970,6.273,all P〈0.05);The overall incidence of complications in the observation group after the treatment was 8%,which was significantly lower than 30% in the control group(χ2 =7.86,P〈0.05). Conclusion Endoscopic surgery assisted small incision in the neck benign thyroid is superior to traditional open sur-gery,and is a simple,effective and safe surgical approach.Compared to traditional open surgery,it has better cosmetic results,which is worthy of clinical application. Key words: Surgical Procedures; Minimally Invasive Thyroid Neoplasms

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Thyroid, Open surgery, Blood loss, Laparoscopic surgery, Clinical efficacy, Incidence (geometry)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of laparoscopic assisted small incision in the neck surgery and traditional open surgical treatment of benign thyroid — Research Paper | ScholarLens