2018Central Plains Medical JournalRequires access

Comparative study of endoscopic small neck incision surgery and conventional thyroid surgery for benign thyroid tumor

Kaisheng Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of endoscopic small neck incision surgery and conventional thyroid surgery on thyroid benign tumors. Methods Ninty cases of benign thyroid tumor were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 45 cases in each group. The control group was treated by the traditional open surgery, and the observation group was treated by video-assisted mini incision surgery, a period of 1 year of follow-up for the two groups, the operation time, incision size, amount of bleeding, hospitalization time, complication rate, postoperative pain and satisfaction of scar was compared between the two groups. Results The incision size, bleeding volume and hospitalization time was (2.31±0.45) cm, (11.22±2.87) ml and (3.18±0.36) d, which was significantly lower than those of the control group[(6.95±1.28) cm, (28.63±7.51) ml and (5.43±0.85) d], but the operation time was (44.62±10.37) min, which was significantly higher than that of the control group[(38.56±8.59) min], there were significant differences (P<0.05). The patients with mild pain accounted for 73.33% in the observation group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (51.11%), the postoperative moderate pain and severe pain were respectively accounted for 22.22% and 4.44%, which was significantly lower than those of the control group (31.11% and 17.78%), there were significant differences(P<0.05). The incidences of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, incision blood stasis, dysphagia, convulsion and other complications was 8.89% in the observation group, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (26.67%), there was significant difference (P<0.05). The overall satisfaction degree of incisional scar after surgery was 95.56%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (73.33%, P<0.05). Conclusions Video-assisted mini incision surgery for benign thyroid tumors has the advantages of small incision, less bleeding, faster recovery, less pain, fewer complications and not obvious scar, which has high safety and high patient satisfaction degree, so it is worthy of popularization and application. Key words: Endoscopy; Small neck incision surgery; Traditional thyroid surgery; Benign thyroid tumor; Complications; Pain score; Incision scar

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical effects of endoscopic small neck incision surgery and conventional thyroid surgery on thyroid benign tumors. Methods Ninty cases of benign thyroid tumor were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 45 cases in each group. The control group was treated by the traditional open surgery, and the observation group was treated by video-assisted mini incision surgery, a period of 1 year of follow-up for the two groups, the operation time, incision size, amount of bleeding, hospitalization time, complication rate, postoperative pain and satisfaction of scar was compared between the two groups. Results The incision size, bleeding volume and hospitalization time was (2.31±0.45) cm, (11.22±2.87) ml and (3.18±0.36) d, which was significantly lower than those of the control group[(6.95±1.28) cm, (28.63±7.51) ml and (5.43±0.85) d], but the operation time was (44.62±10.37) min, which was significantly higher than that of the control group[(38.56±8.59) min], there were significant differences (P<0.05). The patients with mild pain accounted for 73.33% in the observation group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (51.11%), the postoperative moderate pain and severe pain were respectively accounted for 22.22% and 4.44%, which was significantly lower than those of the control group (31.11% and 17.78%), there were significant differences(P<0.05). The incidences of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, incision blood stasis, dysphagia, convulsion and other complications was 8.89% in the observation group, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (26.67%), there was significant difference (P<0.05). The overall satisfaction degree of incisional scar after surgery was 95.56%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (73.33%, P<0.05). Conclusions Video-assisted mini incision surgery for benign thyroid tumors has the advantages of small incision, less bleeding, faster recovery, less pain, fewer complications and not obvious scar, which has high safety and high patient satisfaction degree, so it is worthy of popularization and application. Key words: Endoscopy; Small neck incision surgery; Traditional thyroid surgery; Benign thyroid tumor; Complications; Pain score; Incision scar

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of endoscopic small neck incision surgery and conventional thyroid surgery on thyroid benign tumors. Methods Ninty cases of benign thyroid tumor were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 45 cases in each group. The control group was treated by the traditional open surgery, and the observation group was treated by video-assisted mini incision surgery, a period of 1 year of follow-up for the two groups, the operation time, incision size, amount of bleeding, hospitalization time, complication rate, postoperative pain and satisfaction of scar was compared between the two groups. Results The incision size, bleeding volume and hospitalization time was (2.31±0.45) cm, (11.22±2.87) ml and (3.18±0.36) d, which was significantly lower than those of the control group[(6.95±1.28) cm, (28.63±7.51) ml and (5.43±0.85) d], but the operation time was (44.62±10.37) min, which was significantly higher than that of the control group[(38.56±8.59) min], there were significant differences (P<0.05). The patients with mild pain accounted for 73.33% in the observation group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (51.11%), the postoperative moderate pain and severe pain were respectively accounted for 22.22% and 4.44%, which was significantly lower than those of the control group (31.11% and 17.78%), there were significant differences(P<0.05). The incidences of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, incision blood stasis, dysphagia, convulsion and other complications was 8.89% in the observation group, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (26.67%), there was significant difference (P<0.05). The overall satisfaction degree of incisional scar after surgery was 95.56%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (73.33%, P<0.05). Conclusions Video-assisted mini incision surgery for benign thyroid tumors has the advantages of small incision, less bleeding, faster recovery, less pain, fewer complications and not obvious scar, which has high safety and high patient satisfaction degree, so it is worthy of popularization and application. Key words: Endoscopy; Small neck incision surgery; Traditional thyroid surgery; Benign thyroid tumor; Complications; Pain score; Incision scar

Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Thyroid, Blood loss, Complication, Anesthesia, Thyroidectomy, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of endoscopic small neck incision surgery and conventional thyroid surgery for benign thyroid tumor — Research Paper | ScholarLens