2007•Zhongguo jiceng yiyaoRequires access

Comparison of three methods for results of treponema pallidum antibody determination

王良玲

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

目的 比较甲苯胺红不加热血清试验(TRUST法)、ELISA法及明胶颗粒凝集试验(TPPA法)检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的结果符合率.方法 对,临床受血者输血前系列检查中TP-ELISA法阳性标本,进行双孔复检,仍阳性者进一步用TRUST法和TPPA法检测.结果 44例TP-ELISA法阳性标本中,TRUST法阳性18例,TPPA法阳性39例.TRUST法与ELISA法的阳性符合率为40.9%.TRUST法与TPPA法的阳性符合率为43.6%,TPPA法与ELISA法的阳性符合率最高,为88.6%.结论 TRUSJT法与ELISA法、TPPA法符合率均较低,适宜疗效观察;ELISA法与TPPA法的阳性符合率较高,结果较为准确可靠,适合大样本筛查。

About this research paper

What this paper is about

目的 比较甲苯胺红不加热血清试验(TRUST法)、ELISA法及明胶颗粒凝集试验(TPPA法)检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的结果符合率.方法 对,临床受血者输血前系列检查中TP-ELISA法阳性标本,进行双孔复检,仍阳性者进一步用TRUST法和TPPA法检测.结果 44例TP-ELISA法阳性标本中,TRUST法阳性18例,TPPA法阳性39例.TRUST法与ELISA法的阳性符合率为40.9%.TRUST法与TPPA法的阳性符合率为43.6%,TPPA法与ELISA法的阳性符合率最高,为88.6%.结论 TRUSJT法与ELISA法、TPPA法符合率均较低,适宜疗效观察;ELISA法与TPPA法的阳性符合率较高,结果较为准确可靠,适合大样本筛查。

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

目的 比较甲苯胺红不加热血清试验(TRUST法)、ELISA法及明胶颗粒凝集试验(TPPA法)检测梅毒螺旋体抗体的结果符合率.方法 对,临床受血者输血前系列检查中TP-ELISA法阳性标本,进行双孔复检,仍阳性者进一步用TRUST法和TPPA法检测.结果 44例TP-ELISA法阳性标本中,TRUST法阳性18例,TPPA法阳性39例.TRUST法与ELISA法的阳性符合率为40.9%.TRUST法与TPPA法的阳性符合率为43.6%,TPPA法与ELISA法的阳性符合率最高,为88.6%.结论 TRUSJT法与ELISA法、TPPA法符合率均较低,适宜疗效观察;ELISA法与TPPA法的阳性符合率较高,结果较为准确可靠,适合大样本筛查。

Key concepts: Treponema, Medicine, Antibody, Syphilis, Virology, Microbiology, Immunology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of three methods for results of treponema pallidum antibody determination — Research Paper | ScholarLens