2011•Central Plains Medical JournalRequires access

Fiuvoxamine and maprotiline in the treatment of depression and anxiety

Qiang Li, Yuchun Li, Cai-hong Geng, Zhaohui Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of fluvoxamine in the treatment of patients with refractory depression and anxiety.Methods Sixty -nine patients with refractory depression and anxiety were randomly assigned to 6 weeks treatment with fluvoxamine (n =35 )or maprotiline (n =34 ) and changes from baseline in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression( HAMD - 17),total scores of the two groups,and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS)were compared at 1 week before treatment and 1,2,4,6 weeks after treatment.Results The significant efficacy rates of fluvoxamine group was 78%,while that was 75% in the maprotiline group.There were less side effects in the fluvoxamine group than maprotiline group.Conclusions Fluvoxamine is better than maprotiline in the treatment of refractory depression and anxiety,It shows better efficacy and less side effects.It is beneficial to improve the herapeutic compliance of depressive patients. Key words: Depression; Anxiety; Efficacy; Fluvoxamine; Maprotiline

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of fluvoxamine in the treatment of patients with refractory depression and anxiety.Methods Sixty -nine patients with refractory depression and anxiety were randomly assigned to 6 weeks treatment with fluvoxamine (n =35 )or maprotiline (n =34 ) and changes from baseline in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression( HAMD - 17),total scores of the two groups,and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS)were compared at 1 week before treatment and 1,2,4,6 weeks after treatment.Results The significant efficacy rates of fluvoxamine group was 78%,while that was 75% in the maprotiline group.There were less side effects in the fluvoxamine group than maprotiline group.Conclusions Fluvoxamine is better than maprotiline in the treatment of refractory depression and anxiety,It shows better efficacy and less side effects.It is beneficial to improve the herapeutic compliance of depressive patients. Key words: Depression; Anxiety; Efficacy; Fluvoxamine; Maprotiline

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of fluvoxamine in the treatment of patients with refractory depression and anxiety.Methods Sixty -nine patients with refractory depression and anxiety were randomly assigned to 6 weeks treatment with fluvoxamine (n =35 )or maprotiline (n =34 ) and changes from baseline in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression( HAMD - 17),total scores of the two groups,and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS)were compared at 1 week before treatment and 1,2,4,6 weeks after treatment.Results The significant efficacy rates of fluvoxamine group was 78%,while that was 75% in the maprotiline group.There were less side effects in the fluvoxamine group than maprotiline group.Conclusions Fluvoxamine is better than maprotiline in the treatment of refractory depression and anxiety,It shows better efficacy and less side effects.It is beneficial to improve the herapeutic compliance of depressive patients. Key words: Depression; Anxiety; Efficacy; Fluvoxamine; Maprotiline

Key concepts: Maprotiline, Fluvoxamine, Hamd, Depression (economics), Anxiety, Refractory (planetary science), Medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fiuvoxamine and maprotiline in the treatment of depression and anxiety — Research Paper | ScholarLens