2018Zhonghua mazuixue zazhiRequires access

Efficacy of flupentixol and melitracen in optimizing conventional treatment for postherpetic neuralgia

Xiaoju Miao, Xi Yi, Zhen Zeng, Jie Yuan, Song Wen, Dexin Zhang, Jie Wang, Guiyou Zhang, Song Cao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of flupentixol and melitracen in optimizing conventional treatment for postherpetic neuralgia. Methods Seventy patients of both sexes with thoracolumbar postherpetic neuralgia, were divided into 2 groups (n=35 each) according to the registration order: patients with odd number were included in control group (group C) and patients with even number were included in flupentixol-melitracen group (group D). Patients in group C received conventional treatment: anti-epileptic drugs, analgesia with opioids, neurotrophy, paravertebral nerve block and physical therapy.Flupentixol-melitracen 10.5 mg was taken orally based on the conventional treatment in group D. The time for treatment was recorded.The severity of pain was assessed by using the numeric rating scale, and anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale before treatment and on 3rd and 7th days after treatment.The development of flupenthixol and melitracen-related adverse reactions was recorded during treatment in group D. Results Compared with group C, the numeric rating scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were significantly decreased on 3rd and 7th days after treatment, and the time for treatment was shortened in group D (P<0.05). No flupenthixol- and melitracen-related adverse reactions were found in group D. Conclusion Flupentixol-melitracen can optimize the conventional therapeutic effect for postherpetic neuralgia. Key words: Postherpetic neuralgia; Flupentixol; Anthracenes

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of flupentixol and melitracen in optimizing conventional treatment for postherpetic neuralgia. Methods Seventy patients of both sexes with thoracolumbar postherpetic neuralgia, were divided into 2 groups (n=35 each) according to the registration order: patients with odd number were included in control group (group C) and patients with even number were included in flupentixol-melitracen group (group D). Patients in group C received conventional treatment: anti-epileptic drugs, analgesia with opioids, neurotrophy, paravertebral nerve block and physical therapy.Flupentixol-melitracen 10.5 mg was taken orally based on the conventional treatment in group D. The time for treatment was recorded.The severity of pain was assessed by using the numeric rating scale, and anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale before treatment and on 3rd and 7th days after treatment.The development of flupenthixol and melitracen-related adverse reactions was recorded during treatment in group D. Results Compared with group C, the numeric rating scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were significantly decreased on 3rd and 7th days after treatment, and the time for treatment was shortened in group D (P<0.05). No flupenthixol- and melitracen-related adverse reactions were found in group D. Conclusion Flupentixol-melitracen can optimize the conventional therapeutic effect for postherpetic neuralgia. Key words: Postherpetic neuralgia; Flupentixol; Anthracenes

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of flupentixol and melitracen in optimizing conventional treatment for postherpetic neuralgia. Methods Seventy patients of both sexes with thoracolumbar postherpetic neuralgia, were divided into 2 groups (n=35 each) according to the registration order: patients with odd number were included in control group (group C) and patients with even number were included in flupentixol-melitracen group (group D). Patients in group C received conventional treatment: anti-epileptic drugs, analgesia with opioids, neurotrophy, paravertebral nerve block and physical therapy.Flupentixol-melitracen 10.5 mg was taken orally based on the conventional treatment in group D. The time for treatment was recorded.The severity of pain was assessed by using the numeric rating scale, and anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale before treatment and on 3rd and 7th days after treatment.The development of flupenthixol and melitracen-related adverse reactions was recorded during treatment in group D. Results Compared with group C, the numeric rating scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were significantly decreased on 3rd and 7th days after treatment, and the time for treatment was shortened in group D (P<0.05). No flupenthixol- and melitracen-related adverse reactions were found in group D. Conclusion Flupentixol-melitracen can optimize the conventional therapeutic effect for postherpetic neuralgia. Key words: Postherpetic neuralgia; Flupentixol; Anthracenes

Key concepts: Postherpetic neuralgia, Medicine, Anesthesia, Anxiety, Depression (economics), Adverse effect, Internal medicine, Psychiatry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of flupentixol and melitracen in optimizing conventional treatment for postherpetic neuralgia — Research Paper | ScholarLens