2010Chin J Diabetes MellitusRequires access

Five-year outcome of impaired glucose regulation and its risk factors in community residents

Bo Feng, Qiaohui Qian, Li Xu, Xi-ya Huang, Zhong-ying Meng, Ming Fu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the outcome and risk factors of subjects with impaired glucose regulation (IGR). Methods A total of 192 IGR subjects from a cross-sectional survey in June to August 2002 were followed up for 5 years. Anthropometric measurement and 75 g oral glucose tolerance test were performed. The prevalence of isolated impaired fasting glucose (I-IFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (I-IGT), IFG+ IGT, normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and diabetes mellitus (DM) was compared. t test, Chi-square test, and analysis of variance were used for data analysis. Results Five participants died during 5 years’ follow up. Of the rest 187 subjects, 79 were found to develop DM. The annual incidence of DM and NGT was 8.4 % (79/187/5-y)and 6.3%(59/187/5-y), respectively. The annual incidence of DM was 8.2 %(47/114/5-y), 6.3%(12/38/5-y) and 11.4%(20/35/5-y) for the subjects with I-IGT, I-IFG and IFG+ IGT, respectively. The risk of DM was significantly higher in IFG+ IGT subjects than I-IFT subjects. Compared with IGR subjects, those with new DM were characterized with hypertension, obesity, older age, and higher level of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and 2 h postprandial plasma glucose at baseline. BMI and systolic blood pressure during follow up were significantly higher than at baseline in subjects with new DM. Conclusions There might be a different course of I-IFG, I-IGT and IFG+ IGT progressing to DM among community residents, and there is a higher conversion rate in IFG+ IGT subjects. Various metabolic abnormalities can promote IGR progressing to DM. Key words: Impaired glucose regulation; Diabetes mellitus; Epidemiology

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the outcome and risk factors of subjects with impaired glucose regulation (IGR). Methods A total of 192 IGR subjects from a cross-sectional survey in June to August 2002 were followed up for 5 years. Anthropometric measurement and 75 g oral glucose tolerance test were performed. The prevalence of isolated impaired fasting glucose (I-IFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (I-IGT), IFG+ IGT, normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and diabetes mellitus (DM) was compared. t test, Chi-square test, and analysis of variance were used for data analysis. Results Five participants died during 5 years’ follow up. Of the rest 187 subjects, 79 were found to develop DM. The annual incidence of DM and NGT was 8.4 % (79/187/5-y)and 6.3%(59/187/5-y), respectively. The annual incidence of DM was 8.2 %(47/114/5-y), 6.3%(12/38/5-y) and 11.4%(20/35/5-y) for the subjects with I-IGT, I-IFG and IFG+ IGT, respectively. The risk of DM was significantly higher in IFG+ IGT subjects than I-IFT subjects. Compared with IGR subjects, those with new DM were characterized with hypertension, obesity, older age, and higher level of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and 2 h postprandial plasma glucose at baseline. BMI and systolic blood pressure during follow up were significantly higher than at baseline in subjects with new DM. Conclusions There might be a different course of I-IFG, I-IGT and IFG+ IGT progressing to DM among community residents, and there is a higher conversion rate in IFG+ IGT subjects. Various metabolic abnormalities can promote IGR progressing to DM. Key words: Impaired glucose regulation; Diabetes mellitus; Epidemiology

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the outcome and risk factors of subjects with impaired glucose regulation (IGR). Methods A total of 192 IGR subjects from a cross-sectional survey in June to August 2002 were followed up for 5 years. Anthropometric measurement and 75 g oral glucose tolerance test were performed. The prevalence of isolated impaired fasting glucose (I-IFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (I-IGT), IFG+ IGT, normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and diabetes mellitus (DM) was compared. t test, Chi-square test, and analysis of variance were used for data analysis. Results Five participants died during 5 years’ follow up. Of the rest 187 subjects, 79 were found to develop DM. The annual incidence of DM and NGT was 8.4 % (79/187/5-y)and 6.3%(59/187/5-y), respectively. The annual incidence of DM was 8.2 %(47/114/5-y), 6.3%(12/38/5-y) and 11.4%(20/35/5-y) for the subjects with I-IGT, I-IFG and IFG+ IGT, respectively. The risk of DM was significantly higher in IFG+ IGT subjects than I-IFT subjects. Compared with IGR subjects, those with new DM were characterized with hypertension, obesity, older age, and higher level of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and 2 h postprandial plasma glucose at baseline. BMI and systolic blood pressure during follow up were significantly higher than at baseline in subjects with new DM. Conclusions There might be a different course of I-IFG, I-IGT and IFG+ IGT progressing to DM among community residents, and there is a higher conversion rate in IFG+ IGT subjects. Various metabolic abnormalities can promote IGR progressing to DM. Key words: Impaired glucose regulation; Diabetes mellitus; Epidemiology

Key concepts: Impaired glucose tolerance, Impaired fasting glucose, Medicine, Postprandial, Internal medicine, Waist, Body mass index, Diabetes mellitus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Five-year outcome of impaired glucose regulation and its risk factors in community residents — Research Paper | ScholarLens