2009•Guoji yiyao weisheng daobaoRequires access

The clinical observation of three painless induced abortion

Ying-jun Guan, Shengwei Lu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of three different types of anesthesia treatment on induced abortion. Methods 300 early pregnant woman 300 pregnancy patients who asked for painless induced abortions were randomly divided into three groups, one with propofol intravenously, the other with propofol and sufentanil intravenously, and the third group with propofol and butorphanol intravenously. Observe the venous pain and the degree of cervix relaxation, dizziness, vomiting, bleeding volume, postoperative pain, physical activities and dosage of propofol in deferent groups. Results There were significant different in degree of cervical relaxation and physical activities between group B and C with group A (P<0.05), and also there were quite significant difference in intravenous pain, postoperative pain and propofol dosage between group B, C and A (P< 0.01).There was no difference in the time of waking and bleeding volume among the three groups. The incidence of dizziness of group B was remarkably higher than group A and C (P<0.01).Conclusion Butorphanol combined with propofol used in induced abortion was safe and effective and fewer side effects. It is worth promoting and applying at the grass-root hospitals. Key words: Propofol;  Butorphanol;  Sufentanil;  Induced abortion;  Anesthesia

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical effects of three different types of anesthesia treatment on induced abortion. Methods 300 early pregnant woman 300 pregnancy patients who asked for painless induced abortions were randomly divided into three groups, one with propofol intravenously, the other with propofol and sufentanil intravenously, and the third group with propofol and butorphanol intravenously. Observe the venous pain and the degree of cervix relaxation, dizziness, vomiting, bleeding volume, postoperative pain, physical activities and dosage of propofol in deferent groups. Results There were significant different in degree of cervical relaxation and physical activities between group B and C with group A (P<0.05), and also there were quite significant difference in intravenous pain, postoperative pain and propofol dosage between group B, C and A (P< 0.01).There was no difference in the time of waking and bleeding volume among the three groups. The incidence of dizziness of group B was remarkably higher than group A and C (P<0.01).Conclusion Butorphanol combined with propofol used in induced abortion was safe and effective and fewer side effects. It is worth promoting and applying at the grass-root hospitals. Key words: Propofol;  Butorphanol;  Sufentanil;  Induced abortion;  Anesthesia

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of three different types of anesthesia treatment on induced abortion. Methods 300 early pregnant woman 300 pregnancy patients who asked for painless induced abortions were randomly divided into three groups, one with propofol intravenously, the other with propofol and sufentanil intravenously, and the third group with propofol and butorphanol intravenously. Observe the venous pain and the degree of cervix relaxation, dizziness, vomiting, bleeding volume, postoperative pain, physical activities and dosage of propofol in deferent groups. Results There were significant different in degree of cervical relaxation and physical activities between group B and C with group A (P<0.05), and also there were quite significant difference in intravenous pain, postoperative pain and propofol dosage between group B, C and A (P< 0.01).There was no difference in the time of waking and bleeding volume among the three groups. The incidence of dizziness of group B was remarkably higher than group A and C (P<0.01).Conclusion Butorphanol combined with propofol used in induced abortion was safe and effective and fewer side effects. It is worth promoting and applying at the grass-root hospitals. Key words: Propofol;  Butorphanol;  Sufentanil;  Induced abortion;  Anesthesia

Key concepts: Butorphanol, Propofol, Medicine, Anesthesia, Sufentanil, Abortion, Uterine contraction, Vomiting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The clinical observation of three painless induced abortion — Research Paper | ScholarLens