2019•˜The œJournal of practical nursingRequires access

Application of enteral nutrition feeding procedure in severe patients in ICU

Xinli Ma, Yuanyuan Shi, Ming Yan, Xinrong Guo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of enteral nutrition feeding procedure in ICU in severe patients in order to reduce complications and promote rehabilitation of patients. Methods A total of 184 severe patients admitted to ICU from January to October 2018 were selected as the subjects of the study. 90 patients admitted to the family from January to May were the control group, and 94 patients admitted to the family from June to October were the observation group. The control group adopted routine nutritional support and nursing, and the observation group carried out intensive enteral nutrition feeding process. The nutritional status, immunity, gastrointestinal dysfunction, complications of nosocomial infection and outcome of patients in two groups were compared between the two groups. Results The nutritional indicators of hemoglobin, serum total protein and serum albumin after a week of treatment were (119.73 ± 9.96), (58.88 ± 2.65), (29.09 ± 1.42) g/L, immunization indicators IgA, IgG, IgM were (2.56±0.10), (2.98±0.36), (1.65±0.15) g/L in the observation group. The control groups were (108.02±9.21), (51.90±2.74), (27.80±1.59), (2.09±0.18), (2.01±0.24), (1.41±0.13)g/L, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=5.81-22.48, P<0.01). The incidence of gastrointestinal dysfunction (gastric retention, diarrhea) in the observation group were 11.70%(11/94), 8.51%(8/94), the incidence of nosocomial infections (ventilator associated pneumonia, catheter related blood stream infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infections) were 6.12‰(5/817), 1.53‰(1/650), 0, the outcome indicators of patients (nutritional standard time, ICU hospitalization time, and mortality rate) were (6.12±1.03) d, (10.98±2.03) d, 13.82%(13/94), all were lower than the control group′s 23.33%(21/90), 20.00%(18/90), 13.06‰(11/842), 11.28‰(8/709), 2.88 ‰(2/694), (7.98 ± 1.54) d, (12.21 ± 1.87) d, 26.67%(24/90), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=4.33-8.22, t=6.19, 2.26, P<0.05). Conclusions The procedure of enteral nutrition feeding in patients with severe illness can effectively reduce enteral nutrition complications and enable patients to obtain effective nutrition early. Key words: Severe patients; Enteral nutrition; Feeding process

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the effect of enteral nutrition feeding procedure in ICU in severe patients in order to reduce complications and promote rehabilitation of patients. Methods A total of 184 severe patients admitted to ICU from January to October 2018 were selected as the subjects of the study. 90 patients admitted to the family from January to May were the control group, and 94 patients admitted to the family from June to October were the observation group. The control group adopted routine nutritional support and nursing, and the observation group carried out intensive enteral nutrition feeding process. The nutritional status, immunity, gastrointestinal dysfunction, complications of nosocomial infection and outcome of patients in two groups were compared between the two groups. Results The nutritional indicators of hemoglobin, serum total protein and serum albumin after a week of treatment were (119.73 ± 9.96), (58.88 ± 2.65), (29.09 ± 1.42) g/L, immunization indicators IgA, IgG, IgM were (2.56±0.10), (2.98±0.36), (1.65±0.15) g/L in the observation group. The control groups were (108.02±9.21), (51.90±2.74), (27.80±1.59), (2.09±0.18), (2.01±0.24), (1.41±0.13)g/L, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=5.81-22.48, P<0.01). The incidence of gastrointestinal dysfunction (gastric retention, diarrhea) in the observation group were 11.70%(11/94), 8.51%(8/94), the incidence of nosocomial infections (ventilator associated pneumonia, catheter related blood stream infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infections) were 6.12‰(5/817), 1.53‰(1/650), 0, the outcome indicators of patients (nutritional standard time, ICU hospitalization time, and mortality rate) were (6.12±1.03) d, (10.98±2.03) d, 13.82%(13/94), all were lower than the control group′s 23.33%(21/90), 20.00%(18/90), 13.06‰(11/842), 11.28‰(8/709), 2.88 ‰(2/694), (7.98 ± 1.54) d, (12.21 ± 1.87) d, 26.67%(24/90), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=4.33-8.22, t=6.19, 2.26, P<0.05). Conclusions The procedure of enteral nutrition feeding in patients with severe illness can effectively reduce enteral nutrition complications and enable patients to obtain effective nutrition early. Key words: Severe patients; Enteral nutrition; Feeding process

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of enteral nutrition feeding procedure in ICU in severe patients in order to reduce complications and promote rehabilitation of patients. Methods A total of 184 severe patients admitted to ICU from January to October 2018 were selected as the subjects of the study. 90 patients admitted to the family from January to May were the control group, and 94 patients admitted to the family from June to October were the observation group. The control group adopted routine nutritional support and nursing, and the observation group carried out intensive enteral nutrition feeding process. The nutritional status, immunity, gastrointestinal dysfunction, complications of nosocomial infection and outcome of patients in two groups were compared between the two groups. Results The nutritional indicators of hemoglobin, serum total protein and serum albumin after a week of treatment were (119.73 ± 9.96), (58.88 ± 2.65), (29.09 ± 1.42) g/L, immunization indicators IgA, IgG, IgM were (2.56±0.10), (2.98±0.36), (1.65±0.15) g/L in the observation group. The control groups were (108.02±9.21), (51.90±2.74), (27.80±1.59), (2.09±0.18), (2.01±0.24), (1.41±0.13)g/L, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=5.81-22.48, P<0.01). The incidence of gastrointestinal dysfunction (gastric retention, diarrhea) in the observation group were 11.70%(11/94), 8.51%(8/94), the incidence of nosocomial infections (ventilator associated pneumonia, catheter related blood stream infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infections) were 6.12‰(5/817), 1.53‰(1/650), 0, the outcome indicators of patients (nutritional standard time, ICU hospitalization time, and mortality rate) were (6.12±1.03) d, (10.98±2.03) d, 13.82%(13/94), all were lower than the control group′s 23.33%(21/90), 20.00%(18/90), 13.06‰(11/842), 11.28‰(8/709), 2.88 ‰(2/694), (7.98 ± 1.54) d, (12.21 ± 1.87) d, 26.67%(24/90), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=4.33-8.22, t=6.19, 2.26, P<0.05). Conclusions The procedure of enteral nutrition feeding in patients with severe illness can effectively reduce enteral nutrition complications and enable patients to obtain effective nutrition early. Key words: Severe patients; Enteral nutrition; Feeding process

Key concepts: Medicine, Parenteral nutrition, Incidence (geometry), Internal medicine, Enteral administration, Diarrhea, Pneumonia, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application of enteral nutrition feeding procedure in severe patients in ICU — Research Paper | ScholarLens