2013Chinese Journal of NeuromedicineRequires access

Different antihypertensive drugs preventing early hematoma expansion in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage

Quan-bing Chu, Ruiming Yuan, Guangsheng Chen, Jiajia Xu

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective To determine whether different antihypertensive drugs may have different effects on the hematoma and prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients to provide reference for drug choices in the clinical blood pressure control of patients with ICH.Methods Ninety three ICH patients,admitted to our hospital from January 2010 to January 2012,were chosen in our study and divided into nimodipine treatment group,urapidil treatment group and control group.Hematoma volumes of the patients were recorded at admission,24 and 72 hours after admission,respectively.The neurological disability grades of the patients were also recorded at discharge.Results The hematoma expanded in all of the three groups at 24 and 72 hours of admission,but not enjoying difference as compared with that before admission (P>0.05); the hematoma expansion in the nimodipine group was obviously restricted as compared with that in the urapidil group and control group at 24 and 72 hours of admission (P=0.026,P=0.019; P=0.016,P=0.022).Significant differences on the prognosis in the three groups were noted (P<0.05); the function recovery in the nimodipine group was significantly better as compared with that in the urapidil group and control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Nimodipine have better effect on the early hematoma expansion and function recovery of ICH patients as compared with urapidil; nimodipine should be first chosen in clinic. Key words: Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage; Nimodipine; Urapidil; Hematoma expansion

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To determine whether different antihypertensive drugs may have different effects on the hematoma and prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients to provide reference for drug choices in the clinical blood pressure control of patients with ICH.Methods Ninety three ICH patients,admitted to our hospital from January 2010 to January 2012,were chosen in our study and divided into nimodipine treatment group,urapidil treatment group and control group.Hematoma volumes of the patients were recorded at admission,24 and 72 hours after admission,respectively.The neurological disability grades of the patients were also recorded at discharge.Results The hematoma expanded in all of the three groups at 24 and 72 hours of admission,but not enjoying difference as compared with that before admission (P>0.05); the hematoma expansion in the nimodipine group was obviously restricted as compared with that in the urapidil group and control group at 24 and 72 hours of admission (P=0.026,P=0.019; P=0.016,P=0.022).Significant differences on the prognosis in the three groups were noted (P<0.05); the function recovery in the nimodipine group was significantly better as compared with that in the urapidil group and control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Nimodipine have better effect on the early hematoma expansion and function recovery of ICH patients as compared with urapidil; nimodipine should be first chosen in clinic. Key words: Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage; Nimodipine; Urapidil; Hematoma expansion

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To determine whether different antihypertensive drugs may have different effects on the hematoma and prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients to provide reference for drug choices in the clinical blood pressure control of patients with ICH.Methods Ninety three ICH patients,admitted to our hospital from January 2010 to January 2012,were chosen in our study and divided into nimodipine treatment group,urapidil treatment group and control group.Hematoma volumes of the patients were recorded at admission,24 and 72 hours after admission,respectively.The neurological disability grades of the patients were also recorded at discharge.Results The hematoma expanded in all of the three groups at 24 and 72 hours of admission,but not enjoying difference as compared with that before admission (P>0.05); the hematoma expansion in the nimodipine group was obviously restricted as compared with that in the urapidil group and control group at 24 and 72 hours of admission (P=0.026,P=0.019; P=0.016,P=0.022).Significant differences on the prognosis in the three groups were noted (P<0.05); the function recovery in the nimodipine group was significantly better as compared with that in the urapidil group and control group (P<0.05).Conclusion Nimodipine have better effect on the early hematoma expansion and function recovery of ICH patients as compared with urapidil; nimodipine should be first chosen in clinic. Key words: Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage; Nimodipine; Urapidil; Hematoma expansion

Key concepts: Nimodipine, Urapidil, Medicine, Hematoma, Intracerebral hemorrhage, Anesthesia, Significant difference, Blood pressure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Different antihypertensive drugs preventing early hematoma expansion in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage — Research Paper | ScholarLens