2020•Chin J Postgrad MedRequires access

Comparison of remifentanil and sufentanil on hemodynamics, recovery and cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Jun Xu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of remifentanil and sufentanil on hemodynamics, recovery and cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods A total of 136 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Second People′s Hospital of Fuyang District of Hangzhou from March 2013 to March 2018 were collected and divided into two groups, with 68 patients in each group. The remifentanil group was given conventional anesthesia induction and remifentanil anesthesia maintenance, while the sufentanil group was given conventional anesthesia induction and sufentanil anesthesia maintenance. The levels of hemodynamics, awakening, cognitive function and complications of the two groups were compared. Results The levels of hemodynamics (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure) in sufentanil group was stable than those in remifentanil group. Compared with the remifentanil group, the respiratory recovery time, eye opening time and extubation time of sufentanil group were all increased [(10.01 ± 1.25) min vs. (8.17 ± 0.82) min, (10.27 ± 1.39) min vs. (8.05 ± 0.72) min, (14.65 ± 1.51) min vs. (11.08 ± 1.03) min] (P<0.05). In addition, the scores of mini mental state examination (MMSE) on the 1st day after operation in both groups were lower than those on the 3rd day before and after operation, and the scores in remifentanil group were significantly lower than those in sufentanil group, and the scores of sufentanil group were significantly higher on the 1st day after operation [(21.04 ± 2.02) scores vs. (25.08 ± 2.31) scores] (P< 0.05). The incidence of abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting in sufentanil group was significantly lower than those in remifentanil group [2.94%(2/68) vs. 13.24%(9/68), 5.88%(4/68) vs. 26.47%(18/68)] (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with remifentanil group, sufentanil group has less influence on hemodynamics, faster recovery of cognitive function and less incidence of adverse reactions in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Key words: Cholecystectomy, laparoscopes; Hemodynamics; Remifentanil; Sufentanil; Anesthesia

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the effects of remifentanil and sufentanil on hemodynamics, recovery and cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods A total of 136 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Second People′s Hospital of Fuyang District of Hangzhou from March 2013 to March 2018 were collected and divided into two groups, with 68 patients in each group. The remifentanil group was given conventional anesthesia induction and remifentanil anesthesia maintenance, while the sufentanil group was given conventional anesthesia induction and sufentanil anesthesia maintenance. The levels of hemodynamics, awakening, cognitive function and complications of the two groups were compared. Results The levels of hemodynamics (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure) in sufentanil group was stable than those in remifentanil group. Compared with the remifentanil group, the respiratory recovery time, eye opening time and extubation time of sufentanil group were all increased [(10.01 ± 1.25) min vs. (8.17 ± 0.82) min, (10.27 ± 1.39) min vs. (8.05 ± 0.72) min, (14.65 ± 1.51) min vs. (11.08 ± 1.03) min] (P<0.05). In addition, the scores of mini mental state examination (MMSE) on the 1st day after operation in both groups were lower than those on the 3rd day before and after operation, and the scores in remifentanil group were significantly lower than those in sufentanil group, and the scores of sufentanil group were significantly higher on the 1st day after operation [(21.04 ± 2.02) scores vs. (25.08 ± 2.31) scores] (P< 0.05). The incidence of abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting in sufentanil group was significantly lower than those in remifentanil group [2.94%(2/68) vs. 13.24%(9/68), 5.88%(4/68) vs. 26.47%(18/68)] (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with remifentanil group, sufentanil group has less influence on hemodynamics, faster recovery of cognitive function and less incidence of adverse reactions in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Key words: Cholecystectomy, laparoscopes; Hemodynamics; Remifentanil; Sufentanil; Anesthesia

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the effects of remifentanil and sufentanil on hemodynamics, recovery and cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods A total of 136 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Second People′s Hospital of Fuyang District of Hangzhou from March 2013 to March 2018 were collected and divided into two groups, with 68 patients in each group. The remifentanil group was given conventional anesthesia induction and remifentanil anesthesia maintenance, while the sufentanil group was given conventional anesthesia induction and sufentanil anesthesia maintenance. The levels of hemodynamics, awakening, cognitive function and complications of the two groups were compared. Results The levels of hemodynamics (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure) in sufentanil group was stable than those in remifentanil group. Compared with the remifentanil group, the respiratory recovery time, eye opening time and extubation time of sufentanil group were all increased [(10.01 ± 1.25) min vs. (8.17 ± 0.82) min, (10.27 ± 1.39) min vs. (8.05 ± 0.72) min, (14.65 ± 1.51) min vs. (11.08 ± 1.03) min] (P<0.05). In addition, the scores of mini mental state examination (MMSE) on the 1st day after operation in both groups were lower than those on the 3rd day before and after operation, and the scores in remifentanil group were significantly lower than those in sufentanil group, and the scores of sufentanil group were significantly higher on the 1st day after operation [(21.04 ± 2.02) scores vs. (25.08 ± 2.31) scores] (P< 0.05). The incidence of abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting in sufentanil group was significantly lower than those in remifentanil group [2.94%(2/68) vs. 13.24%(9/68), 5.88%(4/68) vs. 26.47%(18/68)] (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with remifentanil group, sufentanil group has less influence on hemodynamics, faster recovery of cognitive function and less incidence of adverse reactions in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Key words: Cholecystectomy, laparoscopes; Hemodynamics; Remifentanil; Sufentanil; Anesthesia

Key concepts: Sufentanil, Remifentanil, Medicine, Anesthesia, Hemodynamics, Blood pressure, Heart rate, Cholecystectomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of remifentanil and sufentanil on hemodynamics, recovery and cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens