The Application of Sufentanil Combined with Remifentanil for Patients in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Huansen Huang
Abstract
Huansen Huang
Abstract
Objective To investigate the advantages of sufentanil combined with fentnyl in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Sixty ASA grade I-II patients, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly divided into remifentanil group(R, n=30)and sufentanil-remifentanil grorp (SR, n=30). Group R were given remifentanil 1μg/kg in anesthesia induction and maintained with 0.1μg/kg/min; Group SR were given sufentanil 0.5μg/kg in anesthesia induction and maintained with remifentanil 0.1μg/kg/min. The changes of SBP and HR were observed during anesthesia. The recovery of spontaneous breathing time, waking time, extubation time and complication related to recocery and extubation were recorded. VAS and agitation emergence score were measured during postoperation. Result Both two groups had good hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction and operative procedure. Group SR had lower VAS score and lower agitation score compared to group R postoperatively (P0.05). Conclusion Sufentanil for anesthesia induction and Remifentanil for anesthesia maintaining had good hemodynamic stability during introperative procedure and had better postoperative recovery quality for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To investigate the advantages of sufentanil combined with fentnyl in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Sixty ASA grade I-II patients, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly divided into remifentanil group(R, n=30)and sufentanil-remifentanil grorp (SR, n=30). Group R were given remifentanil 1μg/kg in anesthesia induction and maintained with 0.1μg/kg/min; Group SR were given sufentanil 0.5μg/kg in anesthesia induction and maintained with remifentanil 0.1μg/kg/min. The changes of SBP and HR were observed during anesthesia. The recovery of spontaneous breathing time, waking time, extubation time and complication related to recocery and extubation were recorded. VAS and agitation emergence score were measured during postoperation. Result Both two groups had good hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction and operative procedure. Group SR had lower VAS score and lower agitation score compared to group R postoperatively (P0.05). Conclusion Sufentanil for anesthesia induction and Remifentanil for anesthesia maintaining had good hemodynamic stability during introperative procedure and had better postoperative recovery quality for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Key concepts: Remifentanil, Medicine, Sufentanil, Anesthesia, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Cholecystectomy, Hemodynamics, Surgery