2008Clinical Medical EngineeringRequires access

The Application of Sufentanil Combined with Remifentanil for Patients in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Huansen Huang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the advantages of sufentanil combined with fentnyl in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Sixty ASA grade I-II patients, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly divided into remifentanil group(R, n=30)and sufentanil-remifentanil grorp (SR, n=30). Group R were given remifentanil 1μg/kg in anesthesia induction and maintained with 0.1μg/kg/min; Group SR were given sufentanil 0.5μg/kg in anesthesia induction and maintained with remifentanil 0.1μg/kg/min. The changes of SBP and HR were observed during anesthesia. The recovery of spontaneous breathing time, waking time, extubation time and complication related to recocery and extubation were recorded. VAS and agitation emergence score were measured during postoperation. Result Both two groups had good hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction and operative procedure. Group SR had lower VAS score and lower agitation score compared to group R postoperatively (P0.05). Conclusion Sufentanil for anesthesia induction and Remifentanil for anesthesia maintaining had good hemodynamic stability during introperative procedure and had better postoperative recovery quality for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the advantages of sufentanil combined with fentnyl in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Sixty ASA grade I-II patients, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly divided into remifentanil group(R, n=30)and sufentanil-remifentanil grorp (SR, n=30). Group R were given remifentanil 1μg/kg in anesthesia induction and maintained with 0.1μg/kg/min; Group SR were given sufentanil 0.5μg/kg in anesthesia induction and maintained with remifentanil 0.1μg/kg/min. The changes of SBP and HR were observed during anesthesia. The recovery of spontaneous breathing time, waking time, extubation time and complication related to recocery and extubation were recorded. VAS and agitation emergence score were measured during postoperation. Result Both two groups had good hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction and operative procedure. Group SR had lower VAS score and lower agitation score compared to group R postoperatively (P0.05). Conclusion Sufentanil for anesthesia induction and Remifentanil for anesthesia maintaining had good hemodynamic stability during introperative procedure and had better postoperative recovery quality for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the advantages of sufentanil combined with fentnyl in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Sixty ASA grade I-II patients, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were randomly divided into remifentanil group(R, n=30)and sufentanil-remifentanil grorp (SR, n=30). Group R were given remifentanil 1μg/kg in anesthesia induction and maintained with 0.1μg/kg/min; Group SR were given sufentanil 0.5μg/kg in anesthesia induction and maintained with remifentanil 0.1μg/kg/min. The changes of SBP and HR were observed during anesthesia. The recovery of spontaneous breathing time, waking time, extubation time and complication related to recocery and extubation were recorded. VAS and agitation emergence score were measured during postoperation. Result Both two groups had good hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction and operative procedure. Group SR had lower VAS score and lower agitation score compared to group R postoperatively (P0.05). Conclusion Sufentanil for anesthesia induction and Remifentanil for anesthesia maintaining had good hemodynamic stability during introperative procedure and had better postoperative recovery quality for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Key concepts: Remifentanil, Medicine, Sufentanil, Anesthesia, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Cholecystectomy, Hemodynamics, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Application of Sufentanil Combined with Remifentanil for Patients in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens