2008˜The œJournal of practical nursingRequires access

Clinical value of two types of draingae tubes for hepatectomy

胡少华

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical value of closed-type mono-lumen drainage tube(M) and open double-lumen drainage tube(D)for hepstectomy.Methods The data from 99 patients who un-derwent hepatectomy in our depamnent from July 2005 to May 2008 were analyzed retrospectively.All patients were divided into two groups according to the draining methods:group M (n=59)used closed-type mono-lu-men drainage tube and group D(n=40) used double-lumen drainage tube.The incidence of pipe blockage,ef-fusion under diaphragm,the duration of drainign and the duration of hospitalization between the two groups was compsred.Results M group was better than D group in the patency of drainage tube,effusion under di-aphragm,the duration of draining and the duration of hospitalization,P<0.05.Condusions It is advocated to apply closed-type mono-lumen drainage tube after refined hepsteetomy. Key words: Hepatectomy; Drainage; Therapeutic effect

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the clinical value of closed-type mono-lumen drainage tube(M) and open double-lumen drainage tube(D)for hepstectomy.Methods The data from 99 patients who un-derwent hepatectomy in our depamnent from July 2005 to May 2008 were analyzed retrospectively.All patients were divided into two groups according to the draining methods:group M (n=59)used closed-type mono-lu-men drainage tube and group D(n=40) used double-lumen drainage tube.The incidence of pipe blockage,ef-fusion under diaphragm,the duration of drainign and the duration of hospitalization between the two groups was compsred.Results M group was better than D group in the patency of drainage tube,effusion under di-aphragm,the duration of draining and the duration of hospitalization,P<0.05.Condusions It is advocated to apply closed-type mono-lumen drainage tube after refined hepsteetomy. Key words: Hepatectomy; Drainage; Therapeutic effect

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical value of closed-type mono-lumen drainage tube(M) and open double-lumen drainage tube(D)for hepstectomy.Methods The data from 99 patients who un-derwent hepatectomy in our depamnent from July 2005 to May 2008 were analyzed retrospectively.All patients were divided into two groups according to the draining methods:group M (n=59)used closed-type mono-lu-men drainage tube and group D(n=40) used double-lumen drainage tube.The incidence of pipe blockage,ef-fusion under diaphragm,the duration of drainign and the duration of hospitalization between the two groups was compsred.Results M group was better than D group in the patency of drainage tube,effusion under di-aphragm,the duration of draining and the duration of hospitalization,P<0.05.Condusions It is advocated to apply closed-type mono-lumen drainage tube after refined hepsteetomy. Key words: Hepatectomy; Drainage; Therapeutic effect

Key concepts: Medicine, Drainage, Hepatectomy, Lumen (anatomy), Effusion, Surgery, Tube (container), Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical value of two types of draingae tubes for hepatectomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens