The Application and Experience of Double Tube Drainage Method in the Postoperative Breast Cancer
MA Ming-de
Abstract
MA Ming-de
Abstract
Objective:To investigate the application and experience of double tube negative pressure drainage method after modified radical mastectomy.Method:305 cases with breast cancer received modified radical mastectomy come from Huaihe Hospital of Henan University from March 2010 to January 2012.All cases were randomized into two groups.Double-tube method group(160 cases)was given an armpit drainage tube along the leading edge of the latissimus dorsi and a parasternal draingage tube. Single-tube method group(145 cases)was only set an armpit drainage tube along the leading edge of the latissimus dorsi.The drainage volume,drainage time and the rate of subcutaneous water accumulation were observed.Result:Compared with single-tube method(10.4±2.09)d,double-tube drainage time was(8.2±1.39)d,extubation time was shortened.Compared with single-tube method,double-tube method has more total drainage volume,respectively was(470.77±23.52)ml and(442.90±26.40)ml at the same time.There were significant differences( P 0.01);the rate of subcutaneous water accumulation in double-tube method group(7/160)was lower than that in singletube method group(15/145),there was a significant difference( P 0.05).But there were no significant differences in the events of upper limb edema and flap necrosis( P 0.05).Conclusion:Double tube drainage method has a shorter time with a pipe than single-tube drainage method,and has a more total drainage volume than the single-tube drainage method.In addition to this,double-tube drainage method is better than single-tube drainage method in preventing subcutaneous water accumulation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To investigate the application and experience of double tube negative pressure drainage method after modified radical mastectomy.Method:305 cases with breast cancer received modified radical mastectomy come from Huaihe Hospital of Henan University from March 2010 to January 2012.All cases were randomized into two groups.Double-tube method group(160 cases)was given an armpit drainage tube along the leading edge of the latissimus dorsi and a parasternal draingage tube. Single-tube method group(145 cases)was only set an armpit drainage tube along the leading edge of the latissimus dorsi.The drainage volume,drainage time and the rate of subcutaneous water accumulation were observed.Result:Compared with single-tube method(10.4±2.09)d,double-tube drainage time was(8.2±1.39)d,extubation time was shortened.Compared with single-tube method,double-tube method has more total drainage volume,respectively was(470.77±23.52)ml and(442.90±26.40)ml at the same time.There were significant differences( P 0.01);the rate of subcutaneous water accumulation in double-tube method group(7/160)was lower than that in singletube method group(15/145),there was a significant difference( P 0.05).But there were no significant differences in the events of upper limb edema and flap necrosis( P 0.05).Conclusion:Double tube drainage method has a shorter time with a pipe than single-tube drainage method,and has a more total drainage volume than the single-tube drainage method.In addition to this,double-tube drainage method is better than single-tube drainage method in preventing subcutaneous water accumulation.
Key concepts: Medicine, Drainage, Surgery, Tube (container), Modified Radical Mastectomy, Radical mastectomy, Breast cancer, Cancer