2013Medical Innovation of ChinaRequires access

The Application and Experience of Double Tube Drainage Method in the Postoperative Breast Cancer

MA Ming-de

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To investigate the application and experience of double tube negative pressure drainage method after modified radical mastectomy.Method:305 cases with breast cancer received modified radical mastectomy come from Huaihe Hospital of Henan University from March 2010 to January 2012.All cases were randomized into two groups.Double-tube method group(160 cases)was given an armpit drainage tube along the leading edge of the latissimus dorsi and a parasternal draingage tube. Single-tube method group(145 cases)was only set an armpit drainage tube along the leading edge of the latissimus dorsi.The drainage volume,drainage time and the rate of subcutaneous water accumulation were observed.Result:Compared with single-tube method(10.4±2.09)d,double-tube drainage time was(8.2±1.39)d,extubation time was shortened.Compared with single-tube method,double-tube method has more total drainage volume,respectively was(470.77±23.52)ml and(442.90±26.40)ml at the same time.There were significant differences( P 0.01);the rate of subcutaneous water accumulation in double-tube method group(7/160)was lower than that in singletube method group(15/145),there was a significant difference( P 0.05).But there were no significant differences in the events of upper limb edema and flap necrosis( P 0.05).Conclusion:Double tube drainage method has a shorter time with a pipe than single-tube drainage method,and has a more total drainage volume than the single-tube drainage method.In addition to this,double-tube drainage method is better than single-tube drainage method in preventing subcutaneous water accumulation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To investigate the application and experience of double tube negative pressure drainage method after modified radical mastectomy.Method:305 cases with breast cancer received modified radical mastectomy come from Huaihe Hospital of Henan University from March 2010 to January 2012.All cases were randomized into two groups.Double-tube method group(160 cases)was given an armpit drainage tube along the leading edge of the latissimus dorsi and a parasternal draingage tube. Single-tube method group(145 cases)was only set an armpit drainage tube along the leading edge of the latissimus dorsi.The drainage volume,drainage time and the rate of subcutaneous water accumulation were observed.Result:Compared with single-tube method(10.4±2.09)d,double-tube drainage time was(8.2±1.39)d,extubation time was shortened.Compared with single-tube method,double-tube method has more total drainage volume,respectively was(470.77±23.52)ml and(442.90±26.40)ml at the same time.There were significant differences( P 0.01);the rate of subcutaneous water accumulation in double-tube method group(7/160)was lower than that in singletube method group(15/145),there was a significant difference( P 0.05).But there were no significant differences in the events of upper limb edema and flap necrosis( P 0.05).Conclusion:Double tube drainage method has a shorter time with a pipe than single-tube drainage method,and has a more total drainage volume than the single-tube drainage method.In addition to this,double-tube drainage method is better than single-tube drainage method in preventing subcutaneous water accumulation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To investigate the application and experience of double tube negative pressure drainage method after modified radical mastectomy.Method:305 cases with breast cancer received modified radical mastectomy come from Huaihe Hospital of Henan University from March 2010 to January 2012.All cases were randomized into two groups.Double-tube method group(160 cases)was given an armpit drainage tube along the leading edge of the latissimus dorsi and a parasternal draingage tube. Single-tube method group(145 cases)was only set an armpit drainage tube along the leading edge of the latissimus dorsi.The drainage volume,drainage time and the rate of subcutaneous water accumulation were observed.Result:Compared with single-tube method(10.4±2.09)d,double-tube drainage time was(8.2±1.39)d,extubation time was shortened.Compared with single-tube method,double-tube method has more total drainage volume,respectively was(470.77±23.52)ml and(442.90±26.40)ml at the same time.There were significant differences( P 0.01);the rate of subcutaneous water accumulation in double-tube method group(7/160)was lower than that in singletube method group(15/145),there was a significant difference( P 0.05).But there were no significant differences in the events of upper limb edema and flap necrosis( P 0.05).Conclusion:Double tube drainage method has a shorter time with a pipe than single-tube drainage method,and has a more total drainage volume than the single-tube drainage method.In addition to this,double-tube drainage method is better than single-tube drainage method in preventing subcutaneous water accumulation.

Key concepts: Medicine, Drainage, Surgery, Tube (container), Modified Radical Mastectomy, Radical mastectomy, Breast cancer, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Application and Experience of Double Tube Drainage Method in the Postoperative Breast Cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens