2009Inter J Epidemiol Infect DisRequires access

Analysis of efficacy and untoward reaction on 200 cases of brain cysticercosis

Qiong Yang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To assess the efficacy and untoward reaction of hlbendazole, Praziquantel in treatment of brain cysticercosis. Method 200 brain cysticercosis patients' data were selected randomly, which were treated from 2002 to 2007, and divided into two groups. 58 cases in group A were treated with Albendazole alone, 142 cases in group B were treated with both Praziquantel and Albendazole, and then the efficacy and untoward reaction between the two groups were compared. Results The efficacy of two groups was almost the same(P>0.05). The incidence of untoward reaction of group A was less than that in group B, such as intracranial hypertension, falling sickness, mental symptom(P 0.05). Conclusions Albendazole and Praziquantel have certain clinical efficacy in treatment of brain cysticercosis, but untoward reaction of drug combination is more serious. Key words: Neurocysticercosis;  Albendazole;  Praziquantel;  Efficacy;  Untoward reaction

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To assess the efficacy and untoward reaction of hlbendazole, Praziquantel in treatment of brain cysticercosis. Method 200 brain cysticercosis patients' data were selected randomly, which were treated from 2002 to 2007, and divided into two groups. 58 cases in group A were treated with Albendazole alone, 142 cases in group B were treated with both Praziquantel and Albendazole, and then the efficacy and untoward reaction between the two groups were compared. Results The efficacy of two groups was almost the same(P>0.05). The incidence of untoward reaction of group A was less than that in group B, such as intracranial hypertension, falling sickness, mental symptom(P 0.05). Conclusions Albendazole and Praziquantel have certain clinical efficacy in treatment of brain cysticercosis, but untoward reaction of drug combination is more serious. Key words: Neurocysticercosis;  Albendazole;  Praziquantel;  Efficacy;  Untoward reaction

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To assess the efficacy and untoward reaction of hlbendazole, Praziquantel in treatment of brain cysticercosis. Method 200 brain cysticercosis patients' data were selected randomly, which were treated from 2002 to 2007, and divided into two groups. 58 cases in group A were treated with Albendazole alone, 142 cases in group B were treated with both Praziquantel and Albendazole, and then the efficacy and untoward reaction between the two groups were compared. Results The efficacy of two groups was almost the same(P>0.05). The incidence of untoward reaction of group A was less than that in group B, such as intracranial hypertension, falling sickness, mental symptom(P 0.05). Conclusions Albendazole and Praziquantel have certain clinical efficacy in treatment of brain cysticercosis, but untoward reaction of drug combination is more serious. Key words: Neurocysticercosis;  Albendazole;  Praziquantel;  Efficacy;  Untoward reaction

Key concepts: Albendazole, Praziquantel, Neurocysticercosis, Cysticercosis, Medicine, Anthelmintic, Incidence (geometry), Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of efficacy and untoward reaction on 200 cases of brain cysticercosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens