2014•Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparision of the clinical efficacy between minimally invasive removal of intracranial hematoma technology and conservative treatment for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage

Yongsheng Liu, Ming-feng Shen

Abstract

Objective A comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery of intracranial hematoma and conservative treatment for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). Methods 210 cases of HICH were randomized into the observation group (receiving minimally invasive intracranial hematoma dissection ) and the control group (receiving conservative treatment), the total efficiency of this two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group (90.48%)was higher than that of the control group (48.57%) (P<0.05). Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery for HICH treatment could improve the total efficiency of treatment and daily living. Key words: Minimally invasive surgery of intracranial hematoma; Conservative treatment; Hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage; Efficiency

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Key concepts: Medicine, Conservative treatment, Intracranial hematoma, Surgery, Invasive surgery, Hematoma, Intracerebral hemorrhage, Dissection (medical)