The Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Removal of Intracranial Hematoma Technology and Conservative Treatment of Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage

Objective A comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery of intracranial hematoma and conservative treatment for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(HICH) to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of HICH.Methods 86 cases of HICH patients were randomized into the observation group(receiving minimally invasive intracranial hematoma dissection) and the control group(receiving conservative treatment),the total efficiency and the degree of neurological deficit after treatment 1 d,7 d and 14 d were compared.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference of the degree of neurological deficit of the two groups before the treatment(P 0.05),while the degree of neurological deficit of the observation group after treatment 1 d,7 d and 14 d were lower than those of the control group(P 0.05).Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery for HICH treatment could improve the total efficiency of treatment and reduce mortality,improve neurological deficit situation and prognosis,and deserve the clinical expansion.