2009•Chinese Journal of OrthodonticsRequires access

Comparison of Clinical Effects Between Microscrew Implant and headgear in control

Qi-Zhi Su, Yan Yan, Hong-yao Yan

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of microscrew implant and headgear in anchorage control Methods Thirty cases with maxillary protrusion were selected,and randomly divided into two groups,using microscrew implant and headgear respectively.Cephalometric measurements before and after the treatment and Pancherz's analysis was used to evaluate the changes before and after the treatment.the total treatment time was recorded.Resuits Cases with implant changed more evidently than those with headgear in overjet,molar relationship and position of upper ineisor(P<0.05);The position of upper molar was more stable and the treatment time was shorter in implant group,compared with headgear group(P<0.05).Conclusions Microscrew implant could provide better anchorage control than headgear. Key words: Implant; Anchorage; Extraoral arch

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical effects of microscrew implant and headgear in anchorage control Methods Thirty cases with maxillary protrusion were selected,and randomly divided into two groups,using microscrew implant and headgear respectively.Cephalometric measurements before and after the treatment and Pancherz's analysis was used to evaluate the changes before and after the treatment.the total treatment time was recorded.Resuits Cases with implant changed more evidently than those with headgear in overjet,molar relationship and position of upper ineisor(P<0.05);The position of upper molar was more stable and the treatment time was shorter in implant group,compared with headgear group(P<0.05).Conclusions Microscrew implant could provide better anchorage control than headgear. Key words: Implant; Anchorage; Extraoral arch

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of microscrew implant and headgear in anchorage control Methods Thirty cases with maxillary protrusion were selected,and randomly divided into two groups,using microscrew implant and headgear respectively.Cephalometric measurements before and after the treatment and Pancherz's analysis was used to evaluate the changes before and after the treatment.the total treatment time was recorded.Resuits Cases with implant changed more evidently than those with headgear in overjet,molar relationship and position of upper ineisor(P<0.05);The position of upper molar was more stable and the treatment time was shorter in implant group,compared with headgear group(P<0.05).Conclusions Microscrew implant could provide better anchorage control than headgear. Key words: Implant; Anchorage; Extraoral arch

Key concepts: Overjet, Dentistry, Medicine, Implant, Molar, Orthodontics, Dental arch, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Clinical Effects Between Microscrew Implant and headgear in control — Research Paper | ScholarLens