2016Zhonghua xiandai huli zazhiRequires access

Application effect of measuring central venous pressure with different catheter in LBWIs

Xiangmei Hao, Ying Cai, Shujuan Liu, Wei Xue, Yan Xu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To discuss the effect of measuring central venous with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in low birth weight infants (LBWIs). Methods Totally 100 LBWIs admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary hospital from January to Octomber 2015 were selected and were randomly divided into the PICC group and the central venous catheterization (CVC) group, with 50 cases in each group. Patients in the PICC group received the main intravenous catheter, while patients in the CVC group received subclavian intravenous catheter. Data were collected for statistical analysis. The difference of central venous pressure and the incidence rate of complications in patients with different measure methods were compared between two groups. Results The central venous pressure of LBWIs in the PICC group was (8.26±2.18) cmH2O, and in the CVC group was (7.85±2.36) cmH2O (t=0.421, P>0.05); the incidence rates of catheter obstruction, phlebitis and puncture point bleeding of the PICC group were lower than that of the CVC group (χ2=5.01, 6.93, 4.00; P<0.05). Conclusions PICC catheter measurement won′t affect the measure results of central venous pressure in LBWIs, and can reduce the incidence of complications related with central venous catheter in very low LBWIs, so it can be popularized for use. Key words: Central venous pressure; Peripherally inserted central catheter; Low birth weight infant

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To discuss the effect of measuring central venous with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in low birth weight infants (LBWIs). Methods Totally 100 LBWIs admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary hospital from January to Octomber 2015 were selected and were randomly divided into the PICC group and the central venous catheterization (CVC) group, with 50 cases in each group. Patients in the PICC group received the main intravenous catheter, while patients in the CVC group received subclavian intravenous catheter. Data were collected for statistical analysis. The difference of central venous pressure and the incidence rate of complications in patients with different measure methods were compared between two groups. Results The central venous pressure of LBWIs in the PICC group was (8.26±2.18) cmH2O, and in the CVC group was (7.85±2.36) cmH2O (t=0.421, P>0.05); the incidence rates of catheter obstruction, phlebitis and puncture point bleeding of the PICC group were lower than that of the CVC group (χ2=5.01, 6.93, 4.00; P<0.05). Conclusions PICC catheter measurement won′t affect the measure results of central venous pressure in LBWIs, and can reduce the incidence of complications related with central venous catheter in very low LBWIs, so it can be popularized for use. Key words: Central venous pressure; Peripherally inserted central catheter; Low birth weight infant

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To discuss the effect of measuring central venous with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in low birth weight infants (LBWIs). Methods Totally 100 LBWIs admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary hospital from January to Octomber 2015 were selected and were randomly divided into the PICC group and the central venous catheterization (CVC) group, with 50 cases in each group. Patients in the PICC group received the main intravenous catheter, while patients in the CVC group received subclavian intravenous catheter. Data were collected for statistical analysis. The difference of central venous pressure and the incidence rate of complications in patients with different measure methods were compared between two groups. Results The central venous pressure of LBWIs in the PICC group was (8.26±2.18) cmH2O, and in the CVC group was (7.85±2.36) cmH2O (t=0.421, P>0.05); the incidence rates of catheter obstruction, phlebitis and puncture point bleeding of the PICC group were lower than that of the CVC group (χ2=5.01, 6.93, 4.00; P<0.05). Conclusions PICC catheter measurement won′t affect the measure results of central venous pressure in LBWIs, and can reduce the incidence of complications related with central venous catheter in very low LBWIs, so it can be popularized for use. Key words: Central venous pressure; Peripherally inserted central catheter; Low birth weight infant

Key concepts: Medicine, Central venous catheter, Catheter, Central venous pressure, Peripherally inserted central catheter, Incidence (geometry), Anesthesia, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application effect of measuring central venous pressure with different catheter in LBWIs — Research Paper | ScholarLens