Application and Comparison of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter and Under Collarbone Central Venous Catheter for patients with Acute cerebrovascular diseases

Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages of peripheral inserted central catheters(PICC) and under collarbone central venous catheter(CVC) for patients with acute cerebrovascular deseases and provide more information on the clinical application.Methods Fifty-nine patients who were punctured peripherally inserted Central Catheters were the group of PICC.Fifty-two patients who were punctured under collarbone Central Venous Catheter were selected as the group of CVC.The successful rate of tuber insertion,operation time and side reaction for the two group were recorded and evaluated.Results The successful rate of insertion for group of PICC was 94.9%,for the group of CVC that was 98.1%,there were no differences between the two groups(P0.05).The mean time of puncture for PICC group was 10 min,for CVC group was 21 min.the differences between the two groups were significant((P0.01).The incidence of side reaction for PICC group was 3.4%.and CVC group was 23.1%,there were significant differences between them(P0.01).Conclusion The Successful rate between group of PICC and group of CVC had no difference.However,the group of PICC is superior in operation time and had lower side reaction.PICC is worth extending on the clinical application.