2004Parenteral & Enteral NutritionRequires access

The application of different approach for central venous catheterization

Yang Guo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the different approach for cetral venous catheterization(CVC). Methods: The disposable peripherally inserted central catheter(PICC) and the single lumen central venous catheter were used. Patients needing long time iv therapy were enrolled in the study. There were 240 patients in two groups( n =120:120).In Group A, the single lumen central venous catheters were placed into superior vena cava via subclavian vein.And in Group B, PICCs were placed into superior vena cava via peripheral vein. Results: ①Success rate: 97.5%(117/120) for PICC and 100%(120/120) for CVC. ②No pneumothorax or hemothorax in PICC group while 1 case (0.83%) of pneumothorax was found in CVC group. ③Catheter translocation happened in 10 cases (8.33%) in PICC group and 1 case (0.83%) in CVC group. ④Phlebitis was noticed in 2 cases (1.67%) in PICC group but none in CVC group. ⑤Catheter occlusion rate: 14.17% for PICC and 7.5% for CVC.Conclusions: PICC is safe and can partly substitute the central catheterization via subclavian venous access.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: To compare the different approach for cetral venous catheterization(CVC). Methods: The disposable peripherally inserted central catheter(PICC) and the single lumen central venous catheter were used. Patients needing long time iv therapy were enrolled in the study. There were 240 patients in two groups( n =120:120).In Group A, the single lumen central venous catheters were placed into superior vena cava via subclavian vein.And in Group B, PICCs were placed into superior vena cava via peripheral vein. Results: ①Success rate: 97.5%(117/120) for PICC and 100%(120/120) for CVC. ②No pneumothorax or hemothorax in PICC group while 1 case (0.83%) of pneumothorax was found in CVC group. ③Catheter translocation happened in 10 cases (8.33%) in PICC group and 1 case (0.83%) in CVC group. ④Phlebitis was noticed in 2 cases (1.67%) in PICC group but none in CVC group. ⑤Catheter occlusion rate: 14.17% for PICC and 7.5% for CVC.Conclusions: PICC is safe and can partly substitute the central catheterization via subclavian venous access.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: To compare the different approach for cetral venous catheterization(CVC). Methods: The disposable peripherally inserted central catheter(PICC) and the single lumen central venous catheter were used. Patients needing long time iv therapy were enrolled in the study. There were 240 patients in two groups( n =120:120).In Group A, the single lumen central venous catheters were placed into superior vena cava via subclavian vein.And in Group B, PICCs were placed into superior vena cava via peripheral vein. Results: ①Success rate: 97.5%(117/120) for PICC and 100%(120/120) for CVC. ②No pneumothorax or hemothorax in PICC group while 1 case (0.83%) of pneumothorax was found in CVC group. ③Catheter translocation happened in 10 cases (8.33%) in PICC group and 1 case (0.83%) in CVC group. ④Phlebitis was noticed in 2 cases (1.67%) in PICC group but none in CVC group. ⑤Catheter occlusion rate: 14.17% for PICC and 7.5% for CVC.Conclusions: PICC is safe and can partly substitute the central catheterization via subclavian venous access.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pneumothorax, Subclavian vein, Hemothorax, Central venous catheter, Peripherally inserted central catheter, Surgery, Catheter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The application of different approach for central venous catheterization — Research Paper | ScholarLens