2011Zhonghua jianyan yixue zazhiRequires access

Quality assurance and application of secondary standard hematology analyzer for platelet enumeration

Hong Lü, Chenbin Li, Xiao-lin Gu, Mingting Peng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the accuracy and comparability of secondary hematology analyzer for platelet enumeration in order to determine the accuracy and reliability of assigned value of fresh blood.Methods The results between secondary standard hematology analyzer and the reference method of platelet enumeration of 40 specimens were compared according to the document from CLSI EP9-A2.The correlation and bias were calculated.At the same time,the results of secondary standard hematology analyzer between our laboratory and Japan reference laboratory were compared.The fresh blood from normal people was prepared to be used as calibrator after assigned value by secondary standard hematology analyzer.And 36 hematology analyzers were performed correctness validation and calibrated by 36 fresh bloods.Results The results of 40 specimens by secondary standard hematology analyzer and the reference method were ( 108 -326) × 109/L and( 110 -327 ) × 109/L respectively.Correlation coefficient between the secondary standard hematology analyzer and the reference method was 0.993.The bias between two methods was from -3.8%to 3.4%.The results of NCCL and Japan reference laboratory from 2009 to 2010 were( 185 -203) × 109/L and (185 - 198) × 109/L The bias range between our laboratory and reference laboratory in Japan was from - 1.4% to 3.7%.The ranges of coefficient variations of two laboratories were from 2.0% to 3.0% and from 2.6% to 3.4%,respectively.The biases of 20 hematology analyzers were from - 2.6% to 2.1% and they passed the correctness validation.The biases of 16 hematology analyzers were decreased from 3.4% - 12.6%of pre-calibration to 0% - 2.8% of post-calibration.Conclusions The results of secondary standard hematology analyzer are assured to be accurate and comparable by the comparison of reference laboratories.It is feasible that fresh blood assigned value by secondary standard hematology analyzer can be used as calibrator for the hematology analyzer. Key words: Reference standards;  Platelet count;  Calibration;  Reproducibility of results

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the accuracy and comparability of secondary hematology analyzer for platelet enumeration in order to determine the accuracy and reliability of assigned value of fresh blood.Methods The results between secondary standard hematology analyzer and the reference method of platelet enumeration of 40 specimens were compared according to the document from CLSI EP9-A2.The correlation and bias were calculated.At the same time,the results of secondary standard hematology analyzer between our laboratory and Japan reference laboratory were compared.The fresh blood from normal people was prepared to be used as calibrator after assigned value by secondary standard hematology analyzer.And 36 hematology analyzers were performed correctness validation and calibrated by 36 fresh bloods.Results The results of 40 specimens by secondary standard hematology analyzer and the reference method were ( 108 -326) × 109/L and( 110 -327 ) × 109/L respectively.Correlation coefficient between the secondary standard hematology analyzer and the reference method was 0.993.The bias between two methods was from -3.8%to 3.4%.The results of NCCL and Japan reference laboratory from 2009 to 2010 were( 185 -203) × 109/L and (185 - 198) × 109/L The bias range between our laboratory and reference laboratory in Japan was from - 1.4% to 3.7%.The ranges of coefficient variations of two laboratories were from 2.0% to 3.0% and from 2.6% to 3.4%,respectively.The biases of 20 hematology analyzers were from - 2.6% to 2.1% and they passed the correctness validation.The biases of 16 hematology analyzers were decreased from 3.4% - 12.6%of pre-calibration to 0% - 2.8% of post-calibration.Conclusions The results of secondary standard hematology analyzer are assured to be accurate and comparable by the comparison of reference laboratories.It is feasible that fresh blood assigned value by secondary standard hematology analyzer can be used as calibrator for the hematology analyzer. Key words: Reference standards;  Platelet count;  Calibration;  Reproducibility of results

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the accuracy and comparability of secondary hematology analyzer for platelet enumeration in order to determine the accuracy and reliability of assigned value of fresh blood.Methods The results between secondary standard hematology analyzer and the reference method of platelet enumeration of 40 specimens were compared according to the document from CLSI EP9-A2.The correlation and bias were calculated.At the same time,the results of secondary standard hematology analyzer between our laboratory and Japan reference laboratory were compared.The fresh blood from normal people was prepared to be used as calibrator after assigned value by secondary standard hematology analyzer.And 36 hematology analyzers were performed correctness validation and calibrated by 36 fresh bloods.Results The results of 40 specimens by secondary standard hematology analyzer and the reference method were ( 108 -326) × 109/L and( 110 -327 ) × 109/L respectively.Correlation coefficient between the secondary standard hematology analyzer and the reference method was 0.993.The bias between two methods was from -3.8%to 3.4%.The results of NCCL and Japan reference laboratory from 2009 to 2010 were( 185 -203) × 109/L and (185 - 198) × 109/L The bias range between our laboratory and reference laboratory in Japan was from - 1.4% to 3.7%.The ranges of coefficient variations of two laboratories were from 2.0% to 3.0% and from 2.6% to 3.4%,respectively.The biases of 20 hematology analyzers were from - 2.6% to 2.1% and they passed the correctness validation.The biases of 16 hematology analyzers were decreased from 3.4% - 12.6%of pre-calibration to 0% - 2.8% of post-calibration.Conclusions The results of secondary standard hematology analyzer are assured to be accurate and comparable by the comparison of reference laboratories.It is feasible that fresh blood assigned value by secondary standard hematology analyzer can be used as calibrator for the hematology analyzer. Key words: Reference standards;  Platelet count;  Calibration;  Reproducibility of results

Key concepts: Hematology analyzer, Hematology, Enumeration, Spectrum analyzer, Medicine, Coefficient of variation, Internal medicine, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quality assurance and application of secondary standard hematology analyzer for platelet enumeration — Research Paper | ScholarLens