2020•Journal of Soil and Water ConservationOpen access

Watershed water balance changes as furrow irrigation is converted to sprinkler irrigation in an arid region

David L. Bjorneberg, Bradley A. King, Anita C. Koehn

Open full text 21 citations

Abstract

Irrigation is the largest water use in the western United States. The Upper Snake Rock Conservation Effects Assessment Project in southern Idaho began in 2005 to quantify the impacts of conservation practices in this irrigated watershed. The objective of this study was to determine the changes in the watershed water balances as farmers converted furrow irrigated fields to sprinkler irrigation from 2006 to 2016. More than 75% of annual watershed inflow was irrigation water diverted into the watershed from the Snake River and distributed through canals to 82,000 ha of cropland, while annual precipitation was only 10% to 23% of the annual inflow. Approximately 30% of the annual watershed inflow flowed back to the Snake River as irrigation return flow. Water balances showed that irrigation exceeded evapotranspiration (ET) in the spring and fall, indicating that irrigation diversions could be reduced early and late in the irrigation season. Annual irrigation project efficiency, defined as ET divided by the amount of diverted irrigation water, varied from 61% to 73%, but project efficiency did not increase as the amount of cropland that was sprinkler irrigated increased from 46% in 2006 to 59% in 2016. The only significant trends indicating that increasing sprinkler irrigation impacted the water balances were increasing irrigation project efficiency in July and increasing irrigation return flow during the irrigation season. Farmers may be applying less irrigation water with sprinkler irrigation compared to furrow irrigation, which could have caused return flow to increase since irrigation diversions did not change with the supply-based water allocation. Irrigation scheduling based on soil moisture measurement or daily ET would help irrigation application match crop water needs on individual fields. For the entire irrigation project, irrigation efficiency could improve if irrigation diversions into the watershed could be adjusted to more closely match ET in the spring and fall, which may require structural changes to the canal system and policy changes for the Snake River reservoir system.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Irrigation is the largest water use in the western United States. The Upper Snake Rock Conservation Effects Assessment Project in southern Idaho began in 2005 to quantify the impacts of conservation practices in this irrigated watershed. The objective of this study was to determine the changes in the watershed water balances as farmers converted furrow irrigated fields to sprinkler irrigation from 2006 to 2016. More than 75% of annual watershed inflow was irrigation water diverted into the watershed from the Snake River and distributed through canals to 82,000 ha of cropland, while annual precipitation was only 10% to 23% of the annual inflow. Approximately 30% of the annual watershed inflow flowed back to the Snake River as irrigation return flow. Water balances showed that irrigation exceeded evapotranspiration (ET) in the spring and fall, indicating that irrigation diversions could be reduced early and late in the irrigation season. Annual irrigation project efficiency, defined as ET divided by the amount of diverted irrigation water, varied from 61% to 73%, but project efficiency did not increase as the amount of cropland that was sprinkler irrigated increased from 46% in 2006 to 59% in 2016. The only significant trends indicating that increasing sprinkler irrigation impacted the water balances were increasing irrigation project efficiency in July and increasing irrigation return flow during the irrigation season. Farmers may be applying less irrigation water with sprinkler irrigation compared to furrow irrigation, which could have caused return flow to increase since irrigation diversions did not change with the supply-based water allocation. Irrigation scheduling based on soil moisture measurement or daily ET would help irrigation application match crop water needs on individual fields. For the entire irrigation project, irrigation efficiency could improve if irrigation diversions into the watershed could be adjusted to more closely match ET in the spring and fall, which may require structural changes to the canal system and policy changes for the Snake River reservoir system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Irrigation is the largest water use in the western United States. The Upper Snake Rock Conservation Effects Assessment Project in southern Idaho began in 2005 to quantify the impacts of conservation practices in this irrigated watershed. The objective of this study was to determine the changes in the watershed water balances as farmers converted furrow irrigated fields to sprinkler irrigation from 2006 to 2016. More than 75% of annual watershed inflow was irrigation water diverted into the watershed from the Snake River and distributed through canals to 82,000 ha of cropland, while annual precipitation was only 10% to 23% of the annual inflow. Approximately 30% of the annual watershed inflow flowed back to the Snake River as irrigation return flow. Water balances showed that irrigation exceeded evapotranspiration (ET) in the spring and fall, indicating that irrigation diversions could be reduced early and late in the irrigation season. Annual irrigation project efficiency, defined as ET divided by the amount of diverted irrigation water, varied from 61% to 73%, but project efficiency did not increase as the amount of cropland that was sprinkler irrigated increased from 46% in 2006 to 59% in 2016. The only significant trends indicating that increasing sprinkler irrigation impacted the water balances were increasing irrigation project efficiency in July and increasing irrigation return flow during the irrigation season. Farmers may be applying less irrigation water with sprinkler irrigation compared to furrow irrigation, which could have caused return flow to increase since irrigation diversions did not change with the supply-based water allocation. Irrigation scheduling based on soil moisture measurement or daily ET would help irrigation application match crop water needs on individual fields. For the entire irrigation project, irrigation efficiency could improve if irrigation diversions into the watershed could be adjusted to more closely match ET in the spring and fall, which may require structural changes to the canal system and policy changes for the Snake River reservoir system.

Key concepts: Irrigation, Environmental science, Irrigation statistics, Surface irrigation, Hydrology (agriculture), Return flow, Watershed, Evapotranspiration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Watershed water balance changes as furrow irrigation is converted to sprinkler irrigation in an arid region — Research Paper | ScholarLens