2016Unpublished venueRequires access

Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Determinism

Michael McKenna, Derk Pereboom

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter provides characterizations of free will, moral responsibility, and determinism. It considers a range of related matters, such as what the will is, and it introduce the notions of indeterminism, mechanism, and naturalism. Free will is the strongest control condition necessary for moral responsibility. One would think, just given the expression free will itself, that those who use it assume that there is a power or faculty as the will, and when considering whether one has free will, they are asking whether that power can be regarded as free. Philosophers in the Humean tradition often opt to understand free will just in terms of acting freely. Others hold that important distinctions are lost if the discussion is restricted to freedom of action, and that a distinct notion of free will needs to be invoked. The sort of indeterminism discussed here, almost-determinism, and mechanism, as well as determinism itself, might all be captured under the very general umbrella of naturalism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter provides characterizations of free will, moral responsibility, and determinism. It considers a range of related matters, such as what the will is, and it introduce the notions of indeterminism, mechanism, and naturalism. Free will is the strongest control condition necessary for moral responsibility. One would think, just given the expression free will itself, that those who use it assume that there is a power or faculty as the will, and when considering whether one has free will, they are asking whether that power can be regarded as free. Philosophers in the Humean tradition often opt to understand free will just in terms of acting freely. Others hold that important distinctions are lost if the discussion is restricted to freedom of action, and that a distinct notion of free will needs to be invoked. The sort of indeterminism discussed here, almost-determinism, and mechanism, as well as determinism itself, might all be captured under the very general umbrella of naturalism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter provides characterizations of free will, moral responsibility, and determinism. It considers a range of related matters, such as what the will is, and it introduce the notions of indeterminism, mechanism, and naturalism. Free will is the strongest control condition necessary for moral responsibility. One would think, just given the expression free will itself, that those who use it assume that there is a power or faculty as the will, and when considering whether one has free will, they are asking whether that power can be regarded as free. Philosophers in the Humean tradition often opt to understand free will just in terms of acting freely. Others hold that important distinctions are lost if the discussion is restricted to freedom of action, and that a distinct notion of free will needs to be invoked. The sort of indeterminism discussed here, almost-determinism, and mechanism, as well as determinism itself, might all be captured under the very general umbrella of naturalism.

Key concepts: Determinism, Free will, Moral responsibility, Compatibilism, Epistemology, Environmental ethics, Philosophy, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and Determinism — Research Paper | ScholarLens