2015•Unpublished venueRequires access

Nationalism and its political implications in contemporary China

Chunhua Chen

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Since the turn of the twenty-first century, it has increasingly become the consensus among China watchers to explain the “resilience” of the rule of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) with the Party’s reliance on the dual pillars of economic growth and nationalism as a means to bolster its legitimacy. The story goes that since the adoption of reform and opening up in the late 1970s, the CCP’s imported Marxism-Leninist ideology has lost much of its appeal and, therefore, the CCP intentionally encouraged and even manufactured nationalism-or “patriotism” in the Party’s preferred wording-to fill in the ideological vacuum and provide a unifying force for an increasingly pluralistic society. Claiming to be committed to the grand cause of the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, the CCP has presented itself as the only legitimate representative and defender of the national interest. As Thomas Christenson quipped, “Since the Chinese Communist Party is no longer communist, it must be even more Chinese” (1996).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the turn of the twenty-first century, it has increasingly become the consensus among China watchers to explain the “resilience” of the rule of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) with the Party’s reliance on the dual pillars of economic growth and nationalism as a means to bolster its legitimacy. The story goes that since the adoption of reform and opening up in the late 1970s, the CCP’s imported Marxism-Leninist ideology has lost much of its appeal and, therefore, the CCP intentionally encouraged and even manufactured nationalism-or “patriotism” in the Party’s preferred wording-to fill in the ideological vacuum and provide a unifying force for an increasingly pluralistic society. Claiming to be committed to the grand cause of the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, the CCP has presented itself as the only legitimate representative and defender of the national interest. As Thomas Christenson quipped, “Since the Chinese Communist Party is no longer communist, it must be even more Chinese” (1996).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the turn of the twenty-first century, it has increasingly become the consensus among China watchers to explain the “resilience” of the rule of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) with the Party’s reliance on the dual pillars of economic growth and nationalism as a means to bolster its legitimacy. The story goes that since the adoption of reform and opening up in the late 1970s, the CCP’s imported Marxism-Leninist ideology has lost much of its appeal and, therefore, the CCP intentionally encouraged and even manufactured nationalism-or “patriotism” in the Party’s preferred wording-to fill in the ideological vacuum and provide a unifying force for an increasingly pluralistic society. Claiming to be committed to the grand cause of the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, the CCP has presented itself as the only legitimate representative and defender of the national interest. As Thomas Christenson quipped, “Since the Chinese Communist Party is no longer communist, it must be even more Chinese” (1996).

Key concepts: Nationalism, China, Politics, Political science, Political economy, Sociology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nationalism and its political implications in contemporary China — Research Paper | ScholarLens