Evaluation of post total laryngectomy voice rehabilitation by Provox®2 voice prosthesis (preliminary study)
A K Abdel-Haleem, Ekramul Hasan, M. Roushdy, Mohamed S. Abdelwahab
Abstract
Open-access reader
A K Abdel-Haleem, Ekramul Hasan, M. Roushdy, Mohamed S. Abdelwahab
Abstract
Open-access reader
Introduction: Tracheo-esophageal puncture (TEP) with inserting a silicon prosthesis is the gold standard for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy (TL). Provox® is an indwelling voice prosthesis which is widely used nowadays. Objective: to evaluate the outcomes of Provox®2 voice prosthesis in vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Patients and methods: Sixteen patients who had inserted Provox®2 voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy were subjected to history taking, general ENT examination and neck examination. Patients were evaluated for voice outcome two months after the application of the Provox®2 by the maximum phonation time (MPT), Perceptual voice quality analysis by GRBAS scale, Speech intelligibility and Patient’s satisfaction. Results: We found that the production of 100% intelligible voice with a good MPT and quality of voice (assessed by GRBAS scale) using a device with an average life of 375 days would be considered as favorable. Conclusions: The use of Provox®2 voice prosthesis is a safe and satisfactory method for post total laryngectomy voice rehabilitation.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Introduction: Tracheo-esophageal puncture (TEP) with inserting a silicon prosthesis is the gold standard for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy (TL). Provox® is an indwelling voice prosthesis which is widely used nowadays. Objective: to evaluate the outcomes of Provox®2 voice prosthesis in vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Patients and methods: Sixteen patients who had inserted Provox®2 voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy were subjected to history taking, general ENT examination and neck examination. Patients were evaluated for voice outcome two months after the application of the Provox®2 by the maximum phonation time (MPT), Perceptual voice quality analysis by GRBAS scale, Speech intelligibility and Patient’s satisfaction. Results: We found that the production of 100% intelligible voice with a good MPT and quality of voice (assessed by GRBAS scale) using a device with an average life of 375 days would be considered as favorable. Conclusions: The use of Provox®2 voice prosthesis is a safe and satisfactory method for post total laryngectomy voice rehabilitation.
Key concepts: Voice prosthesis, Laryngectomy, Medicine, Prosthesis, Rehabilitation, Esophageal speech, Phonation, Audiology