Voice Rehabilitation after Total Laryngectomy Using the Provox R Voice Prosthesis
Hiroyuki Yamada, Shin-ichiro Nishii, Shigetoshi Sakabe, Ryoji Ishida
Abstract
Open-access reader
Hiroyuki Yamada, Shin-ichiro Nishii, Shigetoshi Sakabe, Ryoji Ishida
Abstract
Open-access reader
Esophageal speech is the first choice for vocal rehabilitation in laryngectomized patients. However, shunt speech is a needed alternative for patients who cannot succeed at esophageal speech. Many kinds of voice prostheses, with good results, have been reported. Provox was selected for 15 laryngectomized patients who were treated in our department. Voice rehabilitation was successful in 13 patients. However, removal of the prosthesis was required in one patient because of stomal stenosis. Voice rehabilitation was not successful in one patient who exhibited esophageal stenosis. The rate of voice rehabilitation was not influenced by the extent of surgery, the dose of radiation, etc.. The maximum phonation time was more than 10 minutes in the 13 patients who succeeded at shunt speech. Prosthetic rehabilitation was requested by two patients who had been successful at esophageal speech. These results suggest that prosthetic voice rehabilitation may be indicated for a wide range of conditions.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Esophageal speech is the first choice for vocal rehabilitation in laryngectomized patients. However, shunt speech is a needed alternative for patients who cannot succeed at esophageal speech. Many kinds of voice prostheses, with good results, have been reported. Provox was selected for 15 laryngectomized patients who were treated in our department. Voice rehabilitation was successful in 13 patients. However, removal of the prosthesis was required in one patient because of stomal stenosis. Voice rehabilitation was not successful in one patient who exhibited esophageal stenosis. The rate of voice rehabilitation was not influenced by the extent of surgery, the dose of radiation, etc.. The maximum phonation time was more than 10 minutes in the 13 patients who succeeded at shunt speech. Prosthetic rehabilitation was requested by two patients who had been successful at esophageal speech. These results suggest that prosthetic voice rehabilitation may be indicated for a wide range of conditions.
Key concepts: Laryngectomy, Voice prosthesis, Audiology, Prosthesis, Rehabilitation, Medicine, Esophageal speech, Larynx