2019In VivoOpen access

Outcome of Oral and Intra-arterial Nimodipine Administration After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage – A Single-centre Study

Gregory Ehrlich, Thomas Kirschning, Holger Wenz, Aldemar Andrés Hegewald, Eva Neumaier‐Probst, Marcel Seiz‐Rosenhagen

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral nimodipine is administered to improve clinical outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). In this study, clinical outcome in patients with and without oral nimodipine administration was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 105 patients did not receive oral nimodipine but did receive intra-arterial nimodipine in the occurrence of hemodynamically relevant vasospasm after aSAH, whereas 74 patients received applications of both. Demographic/radiological details and clinical presentation were abstracted from the case records. RESULTS: Patient baseline characteristics were comparable, a predominance of endovascular coiling was shown in cohort 2 (p=0.0135). Severity of initial aSAH and clinical status at admission (Hunt and Hess) was significantly higher in those receiving oral nimodipine. Incidence of angiographic vasospasm was significantly higher in patients not treated with oral nimodipine (p=0.0305); a significantly better outcome measured by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (p=0.0213), was noted in those receiving oral nimodipine. CONCLUSION: Oral nimodipine administration improved clinical outcome of patients after aSAH and should be administered routinely for such patients.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Oral nimodipine is administered to improve clinical outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). In this study, clinical outcome in patients with and without oral nimodipine administration was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 105 patients did not receive oral nimodipine but did receive intra-arterial nimodipine in the occurrence of hemodynamically relevant vasospasm after aSAH, whereas 74 patients received applications of both. Demographic/radiological details and clinical presentation were abstracted from the case records. RESULTS: Patient baseline characteristics were comparable, a predominance of endovascular coiling was shown in cohort 2 (p=0.0135). Severity of initial aSAH and clinical status at admission (Hunt and Hess) was significantly higher in those receiving oral nimodipine. Incidence of angiographic vasospasm was significantly higher in patients not treated with oral nimodipine (p=0.0305); a significantly better outcome measured by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (p=0.0213), was noted in those receiving oral nimodipine. CONCLUSION: Oral nimodipine administration improved clinical outcome of patients after aSAH and should be administered routinely for such patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral nimodipine is administered to improve clinical outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). In this study, clinical outcome in patients with and without oral nimodipine administration was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 105 patients did not receive oral nimodipine but did receive intra-arterial nimodipine in the occurrence of hemodynamically relevant vasospasm after aSAH, whereas 74 patients received applications of both. Demographic/radiological details and clinical presentation were abstracted from the case records. RESULTS: Patient baseline characteristics were comparable, a predominance of endovascular coiling was shown in cohort 2 (p=0.0135). Severity of initial aSAH and clinical status at admission (Hunt and Hess) was significantly higher in those receiving oral nimodipine. Incidence of angiographic vasospasm was significantly higher in patients not treated with oral nimodipine (p=0.0305); a significantly better outcome measured by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (p=0.0213), was noted in those receiving oral nimodipine. CONCLUSION: Oral nimodipine administration improved clinical outcome of patients after aSAH and should be administered routinely for such patients.

Key concepts: Nimodipine, Medicine, Vasospasm, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Anesthesia, Oral administration, Stroke (engine), Cerebral vasospasm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Outcome of Oral and Intra-arterial Nimodipine Administration After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage – A Single-centre Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens