[No sex differences observed in thrombolysis treatment in acute myocardial infarct but they are found in contraindications and complications].
Hulshof Hc, Lagro-Janssen Al, van der Werf T
Abstract
Hulshof Hc, Lagro-Janssen Al, van der Werf T
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To detect possible differences between men and women in thrombolytic treatment after acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Retrospective chart study. SETTING: University Hospital Nijmegen, the Netherlands. METHOD: The data were studied of all patients diagnosed at discharge as 'myocardial infarction' during the period July 1992 to December 1993, with comparison of men and women. RESULTS: There were 181 patients with myocardial infarction: 53 women (29%) and 128 men (71%). At the time of diagnosis, the women on average were 9 years older than the men. Of these patients, 24 women (45%) and 66 men (52%) were treated with a thrombolytic agent. In 30% of the cases in both men and women, the main reason not to give a thrombolytic agent was exceeding the time limit of 6 hours after the first symptoms. In addition, thrombolysis was refrained from because of contraindications in 23% of the women and in 17% of the men. In women, an 'inconclusive' ECG was an important reason for not giving thrombolysis. There was a difference between the numbers of women and men who developed complications after thrombolysis (25% as against 8%); in women these complications were mostly haemorrhages. 25% of the women and 15% of the men died in hospital. CONCLUSION: Women with a myocardial infarction were given thrombolytic treatment about as often as men. There were sex differences regarding the contraindications to thrombolysis and the complications after thrombolysis.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To detect possible differences between men and women in thrombolytic treatment after acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Retrospective chart study. SETTING: University Hospital Nijmegen, the Netherlands. METHOD: The data were studied of all patients diagnosed at discharge as 'myocardial infarction' during the period July 1992 to December 1993, with comparison of men and women. RESULTS: There were 181 patients with myocardial infarction: 53 women (29%) and 128 men (71%). At the time of diagnosis, the women on average were 9 years older than the men. Of these patients, 24 women (45%) and 66 men (52%) were treated with a thrombolytic agent. In 30% of the cases in both men and women, the main reason not to give a thrombolytic agent was exceeding the time limit of 6 hours after the first symptoms. In addition, thrombolysis was refrained from because of contraindications in 23% of the women and in 17% of the men. In women, an 'inconclusive' ECG was an important reason for not giving thrombolysis. There was a difference between the numbers of women and men who developed complications after thrombolysis (25% as against 8%); in women these complications were mostly haemorrhages. 25% of the women and 15% of the men died in hospital. CONCLUSION: Women with a myocardial infarction were given thrombolytic treatment about as often as men. There were sex differences regarding the contraindications to thrombolysis and the complications after thrombolysis.
Key concepts: Medicine, Thrombolysis, Myocardial infarction, Retrospective cohort study, Internal medicine, Cardiology