2019Structural ConcreteRequires access

Precast versus cast in‐situ concrete in the construction of post‐tensioned box‐girder bridges: Span effect

M. Haider, Mustafa Batikha, Taha Elhag

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this research, the effect of span and construction method on the designed cross section, construction time, and cost of box‐girder bridges has been explored. Two types of construction techniques used in bridges were investigated and compared: cast in‐situ post‐tensioned concrete and precast segmental bridge. To satisfy the aim of this work, the structural design was analyzed for different span lengths (40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 m) to evaluate the designed depth and required prestressing strands, and then design outcomes were utilized in estimating the construction duration and cost of cast in‐situ and precast segmental construction methods. Furthermore, the research has been extended to identify the impact of construction duration on the total cost of studied bridges. This investigation shows that the cost of a box‐girder bridge is affected by the span and the construction method where the precast segmental way was found to be less expensive.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In this research, the effect of span and construction method on the designed cross section, construction time, and cost of box‐girder bridges has been explored. Two types of construction techniques used in bridges were investigated and compared: cast in‐situ post‐tensioned concrete and precast segmental bridge. To satisfy the aim of this work, the structural design was analyzed for different span lengths (40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 m) to evaluate the designed depth and required prestressing strands, and then design outcomes were utilized in estimating the construction duration and cost of cast in‐situ and precast segmental construction methods. Furthermore, the research has been extended to identify the impact of construction duration on the total cost of studied bridges. This investigation shows that the cost of a box‐girder bridge is affected by the span and the construction method where the precast segmental way was found to be less expensive.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In this research, the effect of span and construction method on the designed cross section, construction time, and cost of box‐girder bridges has been explored. Two types of construction techniques used in bridges were investigated and compared: cast in‐situ post‐tensioned concrete and precast segmental bridge. To satisfy the aim of this work, the structural design was analyzed for different span lengths (40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 m) to evaluate the designed depth and required prestressing strands, and then design outcomes were utilized in estimating the construction duration and cost of cast in‐situ and precast segmental construction methods. Furthermore, the research has been extended to identify the impact of construction duration on the total cost of studied bridges. This investigation shows that the cost of a box‐girder bridge is affected by the span and the construction method where the precast segmental way was found to be less expensive.

Key concepts: Precast concrete, Box girder, Structural engineering, Span (engineering), Bridge (graph theory), Engineering, Girder, Prestressed concrete

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Precast versus cast in‐situ concrete in the construction of post‐tensioned box‐girder bridges: Span effect — Research Paper | ScholarLens