2019RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

The Escalation of Lies: An Experimental Study of the Repeated Deception Game

Kazunori Miwa, Satoshi Taguchi, Tatsushi Yamamoto

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Managers' window-dressing behavior is a major concern in accounting. To prevent window dressing, it is important to clarify what situations lead people to tell lies and whether they escalate lying behaviors. We develop a lying aversion hypothesis that people tend to avoid lying, particularly when others are likely to experience serious damage from the deception, and a lying escalation hypothesis that people tell a small lie initially and escalate lying behavior subsequently, even if such escalation would eventually cause serious damage to others. Both hypotheses are supported by laboratory experiments. Our study supports the view that building internal control accounting systems is essential to prevent managers from telling lies and to identify small lies, if any, in the early stage of lying.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Managers' window-dressing behavior is a major concern in accounting. To prevent window dressing, it is important to clarify what situations lead people to tell lies and whether they escalate lying behaviors. We develop a lying aversion hypothesis that people tend to avoid lying, particularly when others are likely to experience serious damage from the deception, and a lying escalation hypothesis that people tell a small lie initially and escalate lying behavior subsequently, even if such escalation would eventually cause serious damage to others. Both hypotheses are supported by laboratory experiments. Our study supports the view that building internal control accounting systems is essential to prevent managers from telling lies and to identify small lies, if any, in the early stage of lying.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Managers' window-dressing behavior is a major concern in accounting. To prevent window dressing, it is important to clarify what situations lead people to tell lies and whether they escalate lying behaviors. We develop a lying aversion hypothesis that people tend to avoid lying, particularly when others are likely to experience serious damage from the deception, and a lying escalation hypothesis that people tell a small lie initially and escalate lying behavior subsequently, even if such escalation would eventually cause serious damage to others. Both hypotheses are supported by laboratory experiments. Our study supports the view that building internal control accounting systems is essential to prevent managers from telling lies and to identify small lies, if any, in the early stage of lying.

Key concepts: Lying, Deception, Psychology, Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Medicine, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Escalation of Lies: An Experimental Study of the Repeated Deception Game — Research Paper | ScholarLens