2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Lying under time pressure and how to promote honesty

L. Weyergans

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Undoubtedly, lying is a significant part of our everyday lives – to a larger extent than we might grasp. When it comes to lying under time pressure, scientific literature suggests that people fail to contemplate and exert self-control. However, recent literature cannot distinguish whether this lack of deliberation yields increased truth-telling or lying. To understand those two opposing lines of research, I conducted an experiment in which people had the opportunity to cheat in order to enhance self-benefit, both under time pressure and with ample time. Moreover, as tools to promote honesty under time pressure are yet unexplored, I bridged the concept of linguistic cues to decision-making under limited time. Scholars found that exposing people to the self-relevant noun ‘cheater’ decreases lying behavior. Thus, I further implemented this insight in my experiment. The results show that there is no difference in lying or truth-telling behavior under time pressure compared to when individuals have ample time. Furthermore, this experiment fails to find a significantly lower level of lying behavior when people are exposed to the word ‘cheater', in both the time pressure and no time pressure treatment. Nevertheless, this research may serve as a stepping stone for future research in the field of dishonesty prevention under time pressure, as understanding lying behavior and how to prevent it remain crucial.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Undoubtedly, lying is a significant part of our everyday lives – to a larger extent than we might grasp. When it comes to lying under time pressure, scientific literature suggests that people fail to contemplate and exert self-control. However, recent literature cannot distinguish whether this lack of deliberation yields increased truth-telling or lying. To understand those two opposing lines of research, I conducted an experiment in which people had the opportunity to cheat in order to enhance self-benefit, both under time pressure and with ample time. Moreover, as tools to promote honesty under time pressure are yet unexplored, I bridged the concept of linguistic cues to decision-making under limited time. Scholars found that exposing people to the self-relevant noun ‘cheater’ decreases lying behavior. Thus, I further implemented this insight in my experiment. The results show that there is no difference in lying or truth-telling behavior under time pressure compared to when individuals have ample time. Furthermore, this experiment fails to find a significantly lower level of lying behavior when people are exposed to the word ‘cheater', in both the time pressure and no time pressure treatment. Nevertheless, this research may serve as a stepping stone for future research in the field of dishonesty prevention under time pressure, as understanding lying behavior and how to prevent it remain crucial.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Undoubtedly, lying is a significant part of our everyday lives – to a larger extent than we might grasp. When it comes to lying under time pressure, scientific literature suggests that people fail to contemplate and exert self-control. However, recent literature cannot distinguish whether this lack of deliberation yields increased truth-telling or lying. To understand those two opposing lines of research, I conducted an experiment in which people had the opportunity to cheat in order to enhance self-benefit, both under time pressure and with ample time. Moreover, as tools to promote honesty under time pressure are yet unexplored, I bridged the concept of linguistic cues to decision-making under limited time. Scholars found that exposing people to the self-relevant noun ‘cheater’ decreases lying behavior. Thus, I further implemented this insight in my experiment. The results show that there is no difference in lying or truth-telling behavior under time pressure compared to when individuals have ample time. Furthermore, this experiment fails to find a significantly lower level of lying behavior when people are exposed to the word ‘cheater', in both the time pressure and no time pressure treatment. Nevertheless, this research may serve as a stepping stone for future research in the field of dishonesty prevention under time pressure, as understanding lying behavior and how to prevent it remain crucial.

Key concepts: Lying, Honesty, Dishonesty, Psychology, Social psychology, Deliberation, Cognitive psychology, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lying under time pressure and how to promote honesty — Research Paper | ScholarLens