2019Unpublished venueRequires access

U.S. Agricultural Trade Policy

Ronald Trostle, Karl D. Meilke, Larry D. Sanders

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Trade policy, particularly agricultural trade policy, has been controversial since at least England repealed its Com Laws. Trade policy is controversial because border controls are seldom put in place, except to underpin domestic programs and policies. For trade policy, the essence of the debate is between advocates of freer trade, and those in favor of maintaining or increasing current levels of support and protection. However, the essence of the trade policy debate is between advocates of trade liberalization and those who promote the subsidization and protection of domestic agricultural producers. In the mid-1980s, changes in US agricultural programs and trade policies helped stem the downward trend in US competitiveness and exports. The Uruguay Round of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade negotiations is the latest attempt to “normalize” trading relationships for agricultural products. The nature of world agricultural trade is changing, as is the environment in which trade takes place.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Trade policy, particularly agricultural trade policy, has been controversial since at least England repealed its Com Laws. Trade policy is controversial because border controls are seldom put in place, except to underpin domestic programs and policies. For trade policy, the essence of the debate is between advocates of freer trade, and those in favor of maintaining or increasing current levels of support and protection. However, the essence of the trade policy debate is between advocates of trade liberalization and those who promote the subsidization and protection of domestic agricultural producers. In the mid-1980s, changes in US agricultural programs and trade policies helped stem the downward trend in US competitiveness and exports. The Uruguay Round of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade negotiations is the latest attempt to “normalize” trading relationships for agricultural products. The nature of world agricultural trade is changing, as is the environment in which trade takes place.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Trade policy, particularly agricultural trade policy, has been controversial since at least England repealed its Com Laws. Trade policy is controversial because border controls are seldom put in place, except to underpin domestic programs and policies. For trade policy, the essence of the debate is between advocates of freer trade, and those in favor of maintaining or increasing current levels of support and protection. However, the essence of the trade policy debate is between advocates of trade liberalization and those who promote the subsidization and protection of domestic agricultural producers. In the mid-1980s, changes in US agricultural programs and trade policies helped stem the downward trend in US competitiveness and exports. The Uruguay Round of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade negotiations is the latest attempt to “normalize” trading relationships for agricultural products. The nature of world agricultural trade is changing, as is the environment in which trade takes place.

Key concepts: Agriculture, Economics, Agricultural economics, International trade, Business, Geography, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
U.S. Agricultural Trade Policy — Research Paper | ScholarLens