2018BachRequires access

On Relevance and Repertoire in the Eighteenth-Century Counterpoint Classroom

Hoag

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This essay, which is equal parts pedagogy and advocacy piece for the study of tonal counterpoint, argues for the relevance of eighteenth-century counterpoint, not only for the training of music majors, but also for today's musical landscape. I outline the method by which I teach my eighteenth-century counterpoint class, with dual emphases on: 1) how I demonstrate and explain to students why studying counterpoint is relevant to their musical training; and 2) my goal of incorporating as much repertoire as possible into the course, which implicitly demonstrates counterpoint's relevance to the construction of all tonal music. Finally, this essay delineates what the study of tonal eighteenth-century counterpoint imparts that species counterpoint does not, and offers some concrete ways to explain this to students. Repertoire covered is enumerated, and the mechanics of assessing both repertoire knowledge and technical knowledge of counterpoint are detailed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This essay, which is equal parts pedagogy and advocacy piece for the study of tonal counterpoint, argues for the relevance of eighteenth-century counterpoint, not only for the training of music majors, but also for today's musical landscape. I outline the method by which I teach my eighteenth-century counterpoint class, with dual emphases on: 1) how I demonstrate and explain to students why studying counterpoint is relevant to their musical training; and 2) my goal of incorporating as much repertoire as possible into the course, which implicitly demonstrates counterpoint's relevance to the construction of all tonal music. Finally, this essay delineates what the study of tonal eighteenth-century counterpoint imparts that species counterpoint does not, and offers some concrete ways to explain this to students. Repertoire covered is enumerated, and the mechanics of assessing both repertoire knowledge and technical knowledge of counterpoint are detailed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This essay, which is equal parts pedagogy and advocacy piece for the study of tonal counterpoint, argues for the relevance of eighteenth-century counterpoint, not only for the training of music majors, but also for today's musical landscape. I outline the method by which I teach my eighteenth-century counterpoint class, with dual emphases on: 1) how I demonstrate and explain to students why studying counterpoint is relevant to their musical training; and 2) my goal of incorporating as much repertoire as possible into the course, which implicitly demonstrates counterpoint's relevance to the construction of all tonal music. Finally, this essay delineates what the study of tonal eighteenth-century counterpoint imparts that species counterpoint does not, and offers some concrete ways to explain this to students. Repertoire covered is enumerated, and the mechanics of assessing both repertoire knowledge and technical knowledge of counterpoint are detailed.

Key concepts: Counterpoint, Repertoire, Relevance (law), Musical, Epistemology, Sociology, Linguistics, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On Relevance and Repertoire in the Eighteenth-Century Counterpoint Classroom — Research Paper | ScholarLens