2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Philosophy in the school curriculum

Ann Margaret Sharp

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Philosophy for Children and Philosophy with Children have a lot in common: First, both see the doing of philosophy in a communal atmosphere as essential. Secondly, teachers have a responsibility to be pedagogically strong and philosophically self-effacing. Thirdly, both see the moral dimension of the communal inquiry procedures as important. Fourthly, both are aware of the political dimension of communal inquiry with its commitment to reasonableness, fallibilism, self-correction and democratic procedures of dialogue and inquiry. The products of inquiry are judgments. Serious philosophical inquiry involves the study of a structured philosophy curriculum. Thus, for Philosophy for Children, the sequenced and structured curriculum is very important for pedagogical reasons. Philosophy involves the acquisition of many dispositions that are in conflict with the socialization process, dispositions to question, to be critical, to look for assumptions, to analyze the inherent meanings of practices and to self-correct.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Philosophy for Children and Philosophy with Children have a lot in common: First, both see the doing of philosophy in a communal atmosphere as essential. Secondly, teachers have a responsibility to be pedagogically strong and philosophically self-effacing. Thirdly, both see the moral dimension of the communal inquiry procedures as important. Fourthly, both are aware of the political dimension of communal inquiry with its commitment to reasonableness, fallibilism, self-correction and democratic procedures of dialogue and inquiry. The products of inquiry are judgments. Serious philosophical inquiry involves the study of a structured philosophy curriculum. Thus, for Philosophy for Children, the sequenced and structured curriculum is very important for pedagogical reasons. Philosophy involves the acquisition of many dispositions that are in conflict with the socialization process, dispositions to question, to be critical, to look for assumptions, to analyze the inherent meanings of practices and to self-correct.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Philosophy for Children and Philosophy with Children have a lot in common: First, both see the doing of philosophy in a communal atmosphere as essential. Secondly, teachers have a responsibility to be pedagogically strong and philosophically self-effacing. Thirdly, both see the moral dimension of the communal inquiry procedures as important. Fourthly, both are aware of the political dimension of communal inquiry with its commitment to reasonableness, fallibilism, self-correction and democratic procedures of dialogue and inquiry. The products of inquiry are judgments. Serious philosophical inquiry involves the study of a structured philosophy curriculum. Thus, for Philosophy for Children, the sequenced and structured curriculum is very important for pedagogical reasons. Philosophy involves the acquisition of many dispositions that are in conflict with the socialization process, dispositions to question, to be critical, to look for assumptions, to analyze the inherent meanings of practices and to self-correct.

Key concepts: Curriculum, Mathematics education, Engineering ethics, Pedagogy, Sociology, Psychology, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Philosophy in the school curriculum — Research Paper | ScholarLens