Metaphor and Metonymy in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach
Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg
Abstract
Open-access reader
Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg
Abstract
Open-access reader
Cognitive Linguistics (CL) is a cover term for some functionalist and cognitivist approaches to the study of language that emerged in the 1970s and share basic theoretical and methodological tenets, most of which are incompatible with Noam Chomsky's theory of Generative Grammar and its more recent offshoots.CL diverges from generative grammar among other things (i) in rejecting the Chomskyan claim that the language faculty is innate, (ii) in emphasizing the semiotic character not only of words but also of grammatical constructions as meaningful units of language, (iii) in attributing an important cognitive and linguistic role to metaphor and metonymy, and (iv) in contending that language structure and use are (relatively) motivated by conceptual and pragmatic factors.The article focuses on points (ii), (iii), and (iv), which are supported empirically by authentic English language data.
OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Cognitive Linguistics (CL) is a cover term for some functionalist and cognitivist approaches to the study of language that emerged in the 1970s and share basic theoretical and methodological tenets, most of which are incompatible with Noam Chomsky's theory of Generative Grammar and its more recent offshoots.CL diverges from generative grammar among other things (i) in rejecting the Chomskyan claim that the language faculty is innate, (ii) in emphasizing the semiotic character not only of words but also of grammatical constructions as meaningful units of language, (iii) in attributing an important cognitive and linguistic role to metaphor and metonymy, and (iv) in contending that language structure and use are (relatively) motivated by conceptual and pragmatic factors.The article focuses on points (ii), (iii), and (iv), which are supported empirically by authentic English language data.
Key concepts: Metonymy, Linguistics, Metaphor, Metaphor and metonymy, Cognitive linguistics, Cognition, Psychology, Cognitive semantics