2018•Synthesis philosophicaOpen access

Metaphor and Metonymy in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach

Klaus-Uwe Panther, Linda L. Thornburg

Open full text 51 citations

Abstract

Cognitive Linguistics (CL) is a cover term for some functionalist and cognitivist approaches to the study of language that emerged in the 1970s and share basic theoretical and methodological tenets, most of which are incompatible with Noam Chomsky's theory of Generative Grammar and its more recent offshoots.CL diverges from generative grammar among other things (i) in rejecting the Chomskyan claim that the language faculty is innate, (ii) in emphasizing the semiotic character not only of words but also of grammatical constructions as meaningful units of language, (iii) in attributing an important cognitive and linguistic role to metaphor and metonymy, and (iv) in contending that language structure and use are (relatively) motivated by conceptual and pragmatic factors.The article focuses on points (ii), (iii), and (iv), which are supported empirically by authentic English language data.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cognitive Linguistics (CL) is a cover term for some functionalist and cognitivist approaches to the study of language that emerged in the 1970s and share basic theoretical and methodological tenets, most of which are incompatible with Noam Chomsky's theory of Generative Grammar and its more recent offshoots.CL diverges from generative grammar among other things (i) in rejecting the Chomskyan claim that the language faculty is innate, (ii) in emphasizing the semiotic character not only of words but also of grammatical constructions as meaningful units of language, (iii) in attributing an important cognitive and linguistic role to metaphor and metonymy, and (iv) in contending that language structure and use are (relatively) motivated by conceptual and pragmatic factors.The article focuses on points (ii), (iii), and (iv), which are supported empirically by authentic English language data.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cognitive Linguistics (CL) is a cover term for some functionalist and cognitivist approaches to the study of language that emerged in the 1970s and share basic theoretical and methodological tenets, most of which are incompatible with Noam Chomsky's theory of Generative Grammar and its more recent offshoots.CL diverges from generative grammar among other things (i) in rejecting the Chomskyan claim that the language faculty is innate, (ii) in emphasizing the semiotic character not only of words but also of grammatical constructions as meaningful units of language, (iii) in attributing an important cognitive and linguistic role to metaphor and metonymy, and (iv) in contending that language structure and use are (relatively) motivated by conceptual and pragmatic factors.The article focuses on points (ii), (iii), and (iv), which are supported empirically by authentic English language data.

Key concepts: Metonymy, Linguistics, Metaphor, Metaphor and metonymy, Cognitive linguistics, Cognition, Psychology, Cognitive semantics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Metaphor and Metonymy in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach — Research Paper | ScholarLens