Prevalence of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in Hospitalized Patients in Tertiary Care Hospital
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Open-access reader
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Open-access reader
Background: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as one of the most common pathogen isolated from patients with very few drugs available for their treatment.Clindamycin is a good alternative optional drug for the treatment of these infections.In vitro routine testing may fail to detect such resistance.Thus it is important to detect such resistance by simple D test. Material and Methods:300 staphylococcal isolates where isolated from clinical samples by conventional microbiological methods.Of these 208(69.33%)were identified as Staphylococcus aureus.Methicillin resistance and inducible clindamycin resistance was detected by cefoxitin disk diffusion method and D test as per CLSI guidelines respectively.Results: 135 (64.9%) were MRSA and 73 (35.09%) were Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), 45(21.63%)isolates showed inducible clindamycin resistance, 19(9.1%)showed constitutive clindamycin resistance, 112(53.84%)showed MS phenotype whereas 32(15.38%)were erythromycin sensitive.Inducible clindamycin resistance and constitutive clindamycin resistance was higher in MRSA than in MSSA (25.92%, 11.11% and 13.69%, 5.47% respectively).Conclusion: D test should be done as routine test in all Microbiology laboratory for detection of true resistance of clindamycin among staphylococcal isolates.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as one of the most common pathogen isolated from patients with very few drugs available for their treatment.Clindamycin is a good alternative optional drug for the treatment of these infections.In vitro routine testing may fail to detect such resistance.Thus it is important to detect such resistance by simple D test. Material and Methods:300 staphylococcal isolates where isolated from clinical samples by conventional microbiological methods.Of these 208(69.33%)were identified as Staphylococcus aureus.Methicillin resistance and inducible clindamycin resistance was detected by cefoxitin disk diffusion method and D test as per CLSI guidelines respectively.Results: 135 (64.9%) were MRSA and 73 (35.09%) were Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), 45(21.63%)isolates showed inducible clindamycin resistance, 19(9.1%)showed constitutive clindamycin resistance, 112(53.84%)showed MS phenotype whereas 32(15.38%)were erythromycin sensitive.Inducible clindamycin resistance and constitutive clindamycin resistance was higher in MRSA than in MSSA (25.92%, 11.11% and 13.69%, 5.47% respectively).Conclusion: D test should be done as routine test in all Microbiology laboratory for detection of true resistance of clindamycin among staphylococcal isolates.
Key concepts: Clindamycin, Staphylococcus aureus, Tertiary care, Medicine, Microbiology, Internal medicine, Antibiotics, Biology