2017•International Journal of Current Research and ReviewOpen access

Prevalence of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in Hospitalized Patients in Tertiary Care Hospital

Author information unavailable

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Background: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as one of the most common pathogen isolated from patients with very few drugs available for their treatment.Clindamycin is a good alternative optional drug for the treatment of these infections.In vitro routine testing may fail to detect such resistance.Thus it is important to detect such resistance by simple D test. Material and Methods:300 staphylococcal isolates where isolated from clinical samples by conventional microbiological methods.Of these 208(69.33%)were identified as Staphylococcus aureus.Methicillin resistance and inducible clindamycin resistance was detected by cefoxitin disk diffusion method and D test as per CLSI guidelines respectively.Results: 135 (64.9%) were MRSA and 73 (35.09%) were Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), 45(21.63%)isolates showed inducible clindamycin resistance, 19(9.1%)showed constitutive clindamycin resistance, 112(53.84%)showed MS phenotype whereas 32(15.38%)were erythromycin sensitive.Inducible clindamycin resistance and constitutive clindamycin resistance was higher in MRSA than in MSSA (25.92%, 11.11% and 13.69%, 5.47% respectively).Conclusion: D test should be done as routine test in all Microbiology laboratory for detection of true resistance of clindamycin among staphylococcal isolates.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as one of the most common pathogen isolated from patients with very few drugs available for their treatment.Clindamycin is a good alternative optional drug for the treatment of these infections.In vitro routine testing may fail to detect such resistance.Thus it is important to detect such resistance by simple D test. Material and Methods:300 staphylococcal isolates where isolated from clinical samples by conventional microbiological methods.Of these 208(69.33%)were identified as Staphylococcus aureus.Methicillin resistance and inducible clindamycin resistance was detected by cefoxitin disk diffusion method and D test as per CLSI guidelines respectively.Results: 135 (64.9%) were MRSA and 73 (35.09%) were Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), 45(21.63%)isolates showed inducible clindamycin resistance, 19(9.1%)showed constitutive clindamycin resistance, 112(53.84%)showed MS phenotype whereas 32(15.38%)were erythromycin sensitive.Inducible clindamycin resistance and constitutive clindamycin resistance was higher in MRSA than in MSSA (25.92%, 11.11% and 13.69%, 5.47% respectively).Conclusion: D test should be done as routine test in all Microbiology laboratory for detection of true resistance of clindamycin among staphylococcal isolates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as one of the most common pathogen isolated from patients with very few drugs available for their treatment.Clindamycin is a good alternative optional drug for the treatment of these infections.In vitro routine testing may fail to detect such resistance.Thus it is important to detect such resistance by simple D test. Material and Methods:300 staphylococcal isolates where isolated from clinical samples by conventional microbiological methods.Of these 208(69.33%)were identified as Staphylococcus aureus.Methicillin resistance and inducible clindamycin resistance was detected by cefoxitin disk diffusion method and D test as per CLSI guidelines respectively.Results: 135 (64.9%) were MRSA and 73 (35.09%) were Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), 45(21.63%)isolates showed inducible clindamycin resistance, 19(9.1%)showed constitutive clindamycin resistance, 112(53.84%)showed MS phenotype whereas 32(15.38%)were erythromycin sensitive.Inducible clindamycin resistance and constitutive clindamycin resistance was higher in MRSA than in MSSA (25.92%, 11.11% and 13.69%, 5.47% respectively).Conclusion: D test should be done as routine test in all Microbiology laboratory for detection of true resistance of clindamycin among staphylococcal isolates.

Key concepts: Clindamycin, Staphylococcus aureus, Tertiary care, Medicine, Microbiology, Internal medicine, Antibiotics, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prevalence of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in Hospitalized Patients in Tertiary Care Hospital — Research Paper | ScholarLens