2006•Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)Open access

Development of novel wine yeast strains using adaptive evolution.

Colin McBryde

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Throughout the course of the wine fermentation, yeast are exposed to several simultaneous and sequential stresses, including hyperosmotic shock, nutrient limitation and ethanol accumulation, which are thought to contribute to the development of stuck or sluggish fermentations. Apart from the extended processing time, fermentations in this state can also produce unfavourable aromatic and flavour compounds, collectively leading to increased manufacturing costs and reduced quality. As a consequence there is demand from winemakers for yeast which can overcome these problems, by assuring the rapid completion of fermentation with minimal production of undesirable metabolites. The aim of this study was to produce and characterise more robust strains and address this demand. \nUtilising a sequential batch fermentation system we have used adaptive evolution to generate variants of the commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain L-2056 and a haploid derivative thereof, C911D, which have superior fermentative performance and/or altered metabolite yields. Thus, both evolved cultures produce more glycerol than the respective parent, with the evolved haploid (FM5) also producing a reduced final ethanol concentration and the evolved diploid (FM16) being able to complete fermentation within a shorter duration. Ten clonal isolates were randomly chosen from each of the haploid and diploid evolved cultures and examined in order to determine the degree of heterogeneity of the evolved cultures. In both cases, 9 of the 10 clonal isolates produced similar fermentation phenotypes to the mixed culture from which they were derived. \nTranscriptome analysis of mixed cultures and clonal cultures revealed large changes in transcript abundance (magnitude and number of genes) at several time points across fermentation in reference to the parent strains. A commonality noted in a high proportion of genes found to be differentially expressed was the occurrence of a GCRI binding site in their promoter regions. Sequencing of the GCRI promoter region in the evolved clone FM16-7 revealed several base pair differences compared to the parent L-2056. We propose that these changes may have led to an altered pattern of expression of GCRI-regulated genes and in turn the improved fermentation phenotype evident in the evolved diploid cultures. \nTo further investigate the significance of alterations in the expression of a specific selection of these genes, deletion strains were constructed in the appropriate parental strain background. Fermentation trials conducted with these deletants revealed fermentation phenotypes which approximated those of the evolved cultures. That is the deletion of either HXTI, HXT3, GLC3, ALD6 and INOI in C911D or ALD6, GPHI and RCKI in L-2056 yielded phenotypes similar to the evolved haploid and diploid respectively. No one deletant strain completely matched the magnitude of the improvement in fermentation of the respective evolved culture. As such it is postulated that a number of mutations are responsible for the acquired phenotypes in the evolved cultures.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Throughout the course of the wine fermentation, yeast are exposed to several simultaneous and sequential stresses, including hyperosmotic shock, nutrient limitation and ethanol accumulation, which are thought to contribute to the development of stuck or sluggish fermentations. Apart from the extended processing time, fermentations in this state can also produce unfavourable aromatic and flavour compounds, collectively leading to increased manufacturing costs and reduced quality. As a consequence there is demand from winemakers for yeast which can overcome these problems, by assuring the rapid completion of fermentation with minimal production of undesirable metabolites. The aim of this study was to produce and characterise more robust strains and address this demand. \nUtilising a sequential batch fermentation system we have used adaptive evolution to generate variants of the commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain L-2056 and a haploid derivative thereof, C911D, which have superior fermentative performance and/or altered metabolite yields. Thus, both evolved cultures produce more glycerol than the respective parent, with the evolved haploid (FM5) also producing a reduced final ethanol concentration and the evolved diploid (FM16) being able to complete fermentation within a shorter duration. Ten clonal isolates were randomly chosen from each of the haploid and diploid evolved cultures and examined in order to determine the degree of heterogeneity of the evolved cultures. In both cases, 9 of the 10 clonal isolates produced similar fermentation phenotypes to the mixed culture from which they were derived. \nTranscriptome analysis of mixed cultures and clonal cultures revealed large changes in transcript abundance (magnitude and number of genes) at several time points across fermentation in reference to the parent strains. A commonality noted in a high proportion of genes found to be differentially expressed was the occurrence of a GCRI binding site in their promoter regions. Sequencing of the GCRI promoter region in the evolved clone FM16-7 revealed several base pair differences compared to the parent L-2056. We propose that these changes may have led to an altered pattern of expression of GCRI-regulated genes and in turn the improved fermentation phenotype evident in the evolved diploid cultures. \nTo further investigate the significance of alterations in the expression of a specific selection of these genes, deletion strains were constructed in the appropriate parental strain background. Fermentation trials conducted with these deletants revealed fermentation phenotypes which approximated those of the evolved cultures. That is the deletion of either HXTI, HXT3, GLC3, ALD6 and INOI in C911D or ALD6, GPHI and RCKI in L-2056 yielded phenotypes similar to the evolved haploid and diploid respectively. No one deletant strain completely matched the magnitude of the improvement in fermentation of the respective evolved culture. As such it is postulated that a number of mutations are responsible for the acquired phenotypes in the evolved cultures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Throughout the course of the wine fermentation, yeast are exposed to several simultaneous and sequential stresses, including hyperosmotic shock, nutrient limitation and ethanol accumulation, which are thought to contribute to the development of stuck or sluggish fermentations. Apart from the extended processing time, fermentations in this state can also produce unfavourable aromatic and flavour compounds, collectively leading to increased manufacturing costs and reduced quality. As a consequence there is demand from winemakers for yeast which can overcome these problems, by assuring the rapid completion of fermentation with minimal production of undesirable metabolites. The aim of this study was to produce and characterise more robust strains and address this demand. \nUtilising a sequential batch fermentation system we have used adaptive evolution to generate variants of the commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain L-2056 and a haploid derivative thereof, C911D, which have superior fermentative performance and/or altered metabolite yields. Thus, both evolved cultures produce more glycerol than the respective parent, with the evolved haploid (FM5) also producing a reduced final ethanol concentration and the evolved diploid (FM16) being able to complete fermentation within a shorter duration. Ten clonal isolates were randomly chosen from each of the haploid and diploid evolved cultures and examined in order to determine the degree of heterogeneity of the evolved cultures. In both cases, 9 of the 10 clonal isolates produced similar fermentation phenotypes to the mixed culture from which they were derived. \nTranscriptome analysis of mixed cultures and clonal cultures revealed large changes in transcript abundance (magnitude and number of genes) at several time points across fermentation in reference to the parent strains. A commonality noted in a high proportion of genes found to be differentially expressed was the occurrence of a GCRI binding site in their promoter regions. Sequencing of the GCRI promoter region in the evolved clone FM16-7 revealed several base pair differences compared to the parent L-2056. We propose that these changes may have led to an altered pattern of expression of GCRI-regulated genes and in turn the improved fermentation phenotype evident in the evolved diploid cultures. \nTo further investigate the significance of alterations in the expression of a specific selection of these genes, deletion strains were constructed in the appropriate parental strain background. Fermentation trials conducted with these deletants revealed fermentation phenotypes which approximated those of the evolved cultures. That is the deletion of either HXTI, HXT3, GLC3, ALD6 and INOI in C911D or ALD6, GPHI and RCKI in L-2056 yielded phenotypes similar to the evolved haploid and diploid respectively. No one deletant strain completely matched the magnitude of the improvement in fermentation of the respective evolved culture. As such it is postulated that a number of mutations are responsible for the acquired phenotypes in the evolved cultures.

Key concepts: Yeast, Wine, Yeast in winemaking, Adaptive evolution, Biology, Computational biology, Food science, Genetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Development of novel wine yeast strains using adaptive evolution. — Research Paper | ScholarLens