2018Journal of Critical CareOpen access

Role of Ulinastatin, a trypsin inhibitor, in severe acute pancreatitis in critical care setting: A retrospective analysis

Jui Lagoo, Moses Charles Dsouza, Anandajith Kartha, Appanervanda Muthanna Kutappa

Open full text 40 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical utility of Ulinastatin, a multifunctional serine protease inhibitor, in the management of severe acute pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the archived data of adult patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis and admitted to surgical intensive care unit with one or more end organ dysfunction. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they did or did not receive ulinastatin. Outcome variables namely in-hospital mortality, development of new-onset organ dysfunction, resolution of existing organ dysfunction by Day 5 and length of hospital stay were compared. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients, 25 who received Ulinastatin (Ulinastatin group) and 23 who did not (Control group) were analyzed. The in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the Ulinastatin group (16% vs 69.6%; p = 0.0003). Significantly smaller proportion of patients (24% vs 73.9%; p = 0.0005) developed new-onset organ dysfunction in the ulinastatin group by day 5. Resolution of existing organ dysfunctions by day 5 was more frequent in the ulinastatin group. Duration of hospital stay was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Ulinastatin treatment was associated with improved outcomes in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical utility of Ulinastatin, a multifunctional serine protease inhibitor, in the management of severe acute pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the archived data of adult patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis and admitted to surgical intensive care unit with one or more end organ dysfunction. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they did or did not receive ulinastatin. Outcome variables namely in-hospital mortality, development of new-onset organ dysfunction, resolution of existing organ dysfunction by Day 5 and length of hospital stay were compared. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients, 25 who received Ulinastatin (Ulinastatin group) and 23 who did not (Control group) were analyzed. The in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the Ulinastatin group (16% vs 69.6%; p = 0.0003). Significantly smaller proportion of patients (24% vs 73.9%; p = 0.0005) developed new-onset organ dysfunction in the ulinastatin group by day 5. Resolution of existing organ dysfunctions by day 5 was more frequent in the ulinastatin group. Duration of hospital stay was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Ulinastatin treatment was associated with improved outcomes in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical utility of Ulinastatin, a multifunctional serine protease inhibitor, in the management of severe acute pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the archived data of adult patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis and admitted to surgical intensive care unit with one or more end organ dysfunction. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they did or did not receive ulinastatin. Outcome variables namely in-hospital mortality, development of new-onset organ dysfunction, resolution of existing organ dysfunction by Day 5 and length of hospital stay were compared. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients, 25 who received Ulinastatin (Ulinastatin group) and 23 who did not (Control group) were analyzed. The in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the Ulinastatin group (16% vs 69.6%; p = 0.0003). Significantly smaller proportion of patients (24% vs 73.9%; p = 0.0005) developed new-onset organ dysfunction in the ulinastatin group by day 5. Resolution of existing organ dysfunctions by day 5 was more frequent in the ulinastatin group. Duration of hospital stay was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Ulinastatin treatment was associated with improved outcomes in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Key concepts: Ulinastatin, Medicine, Organ dysfunction, Acute pancreatitis, Pancreatitis, Retrospective cohort study, Intensive care unit, Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Role of Ulinastatin, a trypsin inhibitor, in severe acute pancreatitis in critical care setting: A retrospective analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens