2023•Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)Open access

A case study of an attempt to implement public participation in the decision making process in a government bureaucracy.

Cheryl D. Stone

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

4) the results of such strategies, definitions and assumptions.In addition there will be a brief review of the literature on the subject of power, as it relates to participation.The chapter will conclude with a summary and analysis of the reviewed literature.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

4) the results of such strategies, definitions and assumptions.In addition there will be a brief review of the literature on the subject of power, as it relates to participation.The chapter will conclude with a summary and analysis of the reviewed literature.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

4) the results of such strategies, definitions and assumptions.In addition there will be a brief review of the literature on the subject of power, as it relates to participation.The chapter will conclude with a summary and analysis of the reviewed literature.

Key concepts: Bureaucracy, Process (computing), Government (linguistics), Public participation, Public administration, Decision-making, Political science, Management science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A case study of an attempt to implement public participation in the decision making process in a government bureaucracy. — Research Paper | ScholarLens