2011European TaxationRequires access

Better Late Than Never – The Finnish CFC Case and the Requirement To Repeal Final Decisions That Conflict with EU Law

Mika Helminen

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

In this note, the author outlines a recent decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of Finland concerning the compatibility of the Finnish controlled foreign company regime with EU law and the grounds for a repeal of a national court’s decisions found to be incompatible with subsequent European Court of Justice case law.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this note, the author outlines a recent decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of Finland concerning the compatibility of the Finnish controlled foreign company regime with EU law and the grounds for a repeal of a national court’s decisions found to be incompatible with subsequent European Court of Justice case law.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this note, the author outlines a recent decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of Finland concerning the compatibility of the Finnish controlled foreign company regime with EU law and the grounds for a repeal of a national court’s decisions found to be incompatible with subsequent European Court of Justice case law.

Key concepts: Repeal, Law, Political science, Supreme court, Economic Justice, Supreme Court Decisions

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Better Late Than Never – The Finnish CFC Case and the Requirement To Repeal Final Decisions That Conflict with EU Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens