2010eYLS (Yale Law School)Open access

Lawyering in the Supreme Court

Paul D. Clement

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

As a Lichtenstein Distinguished Lecturer, Professor Clement was asked to write an article for the Hofstra Law Review on the topic of his lecture. His article, cited below, may be downloaded from the link at the top of the page.\nPaul D. Clement, Lawyering in the Supreme Court, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 909 (2010).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As a Lichtenstein Distinguished Lecturer, Professor Clement was asked to write an article for the Hofstra Law Review on the topic of his lecture. His article, cited below, may be downloaded from the link at the top of the page.\nPaul D. Clement, Lawyering in the Supreme Court, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 909 (2010).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As a Lichtenstein Distinguished Lecturer, Professor Clement was asked to write an article for the Hofstra Law Review on the topic of his lecture. His article, cited below, may be downloaded from the link at the top of the page.\nPaul D. Clement, Lawyering in the Supreme Court, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 909 (2010).

Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Certiorari, Majority opinion, Notice, Political science, Court of record, Original jurisdiction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lawyering in the Supreme Court — Research Paper | ScholarLens