Lawyering in the Supreme Court
Paul D. Clement
Abstract
Open-access reader
Paul D. Clement
Abstract
Open-access reader
As a Lichtenstein Distinguished Lecturer, Professor Clement was asked to write an article for the Hofstra Law Review on the topic of his lecture. His article, cited below, may be downloaded from the link at the top of the page.\nPaul D. Clement, Lawyering in the Supreme Court, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 909 (2010).
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
As a Lichtenstein Distinguished Lecturer, Professor Clement was asked to write an article for the Hofstra Law Review on the topic of his lecture. His article, cited below, may be downloaded from the link at the top of the page.\nPaul D. Clement, Lawyering in the Supreme Court, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 909 (2010).
Key concepts: Supreme court, Law, Certiorari, Majority opinion, Notice, Political science, Court of record, Original jurisdiction