2017Bilişim Teknolojileri DergisiOpen access

Performance Evaluation of Tunneling Mechanism in MIPv6 over IPv4

Ahmad-Ali KWIZERA, Cemal Koçak

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

MIPv6 protocol is designed to support the mobility of the nodes and maintain ongoing connections while changing their locations. Currently, most of the internet infrastructures are using IPv4. MIPv6 as an extension of IPv6 is not compatible with IPv4; in this case, the transition mechanisms were used to tunnel MIPv6 traffic through IPv4 internet. This paper analyzes the performance of Manual Tunneling and 6to4 Tunneling in MIPv6 Networks, which communicate across IPv4 internet. Applications like FTP, HTTP, Database and Email using performance parameters such as Throughput, Response Time and End-to-End Delay were compared to find the best transition mechanism for MIPv6 Networks. Simulations results show that Manual Tunneling performed better with 12% than 6to4 Tunneling in Email, and HTTP applications with 13, 54%, whereas 6to4 Tunneling, outperforms Manual Tunneling in a Database application, while in FTP application, those two transition mechanisms have the same performance.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

MIPv6 protocol is designed to support the mobility of the nodes and maintain ongoing connections while changing their locations. Currently, most of the internet infrastructures are using IPv4. MIPv6 as an extension of IPv6 is not compatible with IPv4; in this case, the transition mechanisms were used to tunnel MIPv6 traffic through IPv4 internet. This paper analyzes the performance of Manual Tunneling and 6to4 Tunneling in MIPv6 Networks, which communicate across IPv4 internet. Applications like FTP, HTTP, Database and Email using performance parameters such as Throughput, Response Time and End-to-End Delay were compared to find the best transition mechanism for MIPv6 Networks. Simulations results show that Manual Tunneling performed better with 12% than 6to4 Tunneling in Email, and HTTP applications with 13, 54%, whereas 6to4 Tunneling, outperforms Manual Tunneling in a Database application, while in FTP application, those two transition mechanisms have the same performance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

MIPv6 protocol is designed to support the mobility of the nodes and maintain ongoing connections while changing their locations. Currently, most of the internet infrastructures are using IPv4. MIPv6 as an extension of IPv6 is not compatible with IPv4; in this case, the transition mechanisms were used to tunnel MIPv6 traffic through IPv4 internet. This paper analyzes the performance of Manual Tunneling and 6to4 Tunneling in MIPv6 Networks, which communicate across IPv4 internet. Applications like FTP, HTTP, Database and Email using performance parameters such as Throughput, Response Time and End-to-End Delay were compared to find the best transition mechanism for MIPv6 Networks. Simulations results show that Manual Tunneling performed better with 12% than 6to4 Tunneling in Email, and HTTP applications with 13, 54%, whereas 6to4 Tunneling, outperforms Manual Tunneling in a Database application, while in FTP application, those two transition mechanisms have the same performance.

Key concepts: IPv4, File Transfer Protocol, IPv6, Computer science, Computer network, The Internet, Quantum tunnelling, Throughput

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance Evaluation of Tunneling Mechanism in MIPv6 over IPv4 — Research Paper | ScholarLens