2017CiiT international journal of programmable device circuits and systemsRequires access

Analysis of Floorplanning Techniques for ASIC Development

Sachin S. Pandya, Rajendrakumar Patel

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The nature of floorplanning in complex hierarchical designs decides timing closure, power dissipation, interconnect length and area of chip. Particularly Floorplanning includes manual arrangement of hard macros such that area occupied on the silicon will be less and hence less congestion. Most of the problems in VLSI physical design process are Non-Deterministic Polynomial time (NP) hard problems [6]. The future growth of VLSI circuits relies on the development of physical design automation tools [5]. In the physical design process, Floorplanning is an important step, because it sets up the ground work for a good layout. It is the problem of placing a set of circuit modules on a chip to minimize the total area and interconnect cost. Various aspects of VLSI floorplanning problem have been studied in this paper. The VLSI Design Flow for ASIC comprises of various steps like design specification, architectural design, RTL modeling, synthesis, physical design, layout signoff, fabrication, package and test. The physical design process is further divided into partitioning, floorplanning, placement, clock tree synthesis, signal routing and timing closure. Floorplanning acts as very important activity in physical design because it sets up the ground work for a good layout. The nature of floorplanning in complex hierarchical designs decides timing closure, power dissipation and area of chip and interconnects’ length. In this paper various floorplanning approaches are studied and their relative pros and cons are inferred and reported.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The nature of floorplanning in complex hierarchical designs decides timing closure, power dissipation, interconnect length and area of chip. Particularly Floorplanning includes manual arrangement of hard macros such that area occupied on the silicon will be less and hence less congestion. Most of the problems in VLSI physical design process are Non-Deterministic Polynomial time (NP) hard problems [6]. The future growth of VLSI circuits relies on the development of physical design automation tools [5]. In the physical design process, Floorplanning is an important step, because it sets up the ground work for a good layout. It is the problem of placing a set of circuit modules on a chip to minimize the total area and interconnect cost. Various aspects of VLSI floorplanning problem have been studied in this paper. The VLSI Design Flow for ASIC comprises of various steps like design specification, architectural design, RTL modeling, synthesis, physical design, layout signoff, fabrication, package and test. The physical design process is further divided into partitioning, floorplanning, placement, clock tree synthesis, signal routing and timing closure. Floorplanning acts as very important activity in physical design because it sets up the ground work for a good layout. The nature of floorplanning in complex hierarchical designs decides timing closure, power dissipation and area of chip and interconnects’ length. In this paper various floorplanning approaches are studied and their relative pros and cons are inferred and reported.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The nature of floorplanning in complex hierarchical designs decides timing closure, power dissipation, interconnect length and area of chip. Particularly Floorplanning includes manual arrangement of hard macros such that area occupied on the silicon will be less and hence less congestion. Most of the problems in VLSI physical design process are Non-Deterministic Polynomial time (NP) hard problems [6]. The future growth of VLSI circuits relies on the development of physical design automation tools [5]. In the physical design process, Floorplanning is an important step, because it sets up the ground work for a good layout. It is the problem of placing a set of circuit modules on a chip to minimize the total area and interconnect cost. Various aspects of VLSI floorplanning problem have been studied in this paper. The VLSI Design Flow for ASIC comprises of various steps like design specification, architectural design, RTL modeling, synthesis, physical design, layout signoff, fabrication, package and test. The physical design process is further divided into partitioning, floorplanning, placement, clock tree synthesis, signal routing and timing closure. Floorplanning acts as very important activity in physical design because it sets up the ground work for a good layout. The nature of floorplanning in complex hierarchical designs decides timing closure, power dissipation and area of chip and interconnects’ length. In this paper various floorplanning approaches are studied and their relative pros and cons are inferred and reported.

Key concepts: Floorplan, Physical design, Very-large-scale integration, Application-specific integrated circuit, Routing (electronic design automation), Integrated circuit layout, Computer science, Design flow

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of Floorplanning Techniques for ASIC Development — Research Paper | ScholarLens