2017Sexually Transmitted InfectionsOpen access

P023 Investigating the clinical value of treponema pallidum PCR within a UK gum clinic

Alice Parsloe, David White, Erasmus Smit

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction Syphilis is a multistage STI caused by Treponema pallidum. The classic lesion of primary syphilis is a chancre – a single, painless, indurated ulcer with a clean base. The number of cases is on the rise, and it has been historically difficult to diagnose due to its variable presentation, requiring clinical correlation and multiple investigations. PCR use has increased recently in investigation of these ulcers. However, how crucial is PCR testing in primary syphilis, when cheaper investigations can lead to a diagnosis? Methods Investigation results were collected from 58 patients presenting between January and December 2015 who were treated for primary syphilis, including presentation, serology and PCR status. How they were diagnosed as having primary syphilis was noted and whether this was on presentation, follow up or via PCR. Results 47 patients had a positive PCR, 11 patients had a negative PCR but were treated for primary syphilis. We found 3 patients would have not been picked up as having primary syphilis if there was no PCR performed. The sensitivity and specificity of Treponema pallidum PCR was 81% and 100% respectively. Discussion PCR was essential in diagnosing 3 patients with syphilis who would have been missed, therefore PCR is a crucial tool in contributing to the diagnosis of primary syphilis. The potential implications of missing syphilis diagnosis are serious, as patients can develop progressive disease and unknowingly affect sexual partners.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction Syphilis is a multistage STI caused by Treponema pallidum. The classic lesion of primary syphilis is a chancre – a single, painless, indurated ulcer with a clean base. The number of cases is on the rise, and it has been historically difficult to diagnose due to its variable presentation, requiring clinical correlation and multiple investigations. PCR use has increased recently in investigation of these ulcers. However, how crucial is PCR testing in primary syphilis, when cheaper investigations can lead to a diagnosis? Methods Investigation results were collected from 58 patients presenting between January and December 2015 who were treated for primary syphilis, including presentation, serology and PCR status. How they were diagnosed as having primary syphilis was noted and whether this was on presentation, follow up or via PCR. Results 47 patients had a positive PCR, 11 patients had a negative PCR but were treated for primary syphilis. We found 3 patients would have not been picked up as having primary syphilis if there was no PCR performed. The sensitivity and specificity of Treponema pallidum PCR was 81% and 100% respectively. Discussion PCR was essential in diagnosing 3 patients with syphilis who would have been missed, therefore PCR is a crucial tool in contributing to the diagnosis of primary syphilis. The potential implications of missing syphilis diagnosis are serious, as patients can develop progressive disease and unknowingly affect sexual partners.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction Syphilis is a multistage STI caused by Treponema pallidum. The classic lesion of primary syphilis is a chancre – a single, painless, indurated ulcer with a clean base. The number of cases is on the rise, and it has been historically difficult to diagnose due to its variable presentation, requiring clinical correlation and multiple investigations. PCR use has increased recently in investigation of these ulcers. However, how crucial is PCR testing in primary syphilis, when cheaper investigations can lead to a diagnosis? Methods Investigation results were collected from 58 patients presenting between January and December 2015 who were treated for primary syphilis, including presentation, serology and PCR status. How they were diagnosed as having primary syphilis was noted and whether this was on presentation, follow up or via PCR. Results 47 patients had a positive PCR, 11 patients had a negative PCR but were treated for primary syphilis. We found 3 patients would have not been picked up as having primary syphilis if there was no PCR performed. The sensitivity and specificity of Treponema pallidum PCR was 81% and 100% respectively. Discussion PCR was essential in diagnosing 3 patients with syphilis who would have been missed, therefore PCR is a crucial tool in contributing to the diagnosis of primary syphilis. The potential implications of missing syphilis diagnosis are serious, as patients can develop progressive disease and unknowingly affect sexual partners.

Key concepts: Treponema, Medicine, Syphilis, Virology, Family medicine, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
P023 Investigating the clinical value of treponema pallidum PCR within a UK gum clinic — Research Paper | ScholarLens