Adventure Based Learning Module: Content Validity and Reliability Process
Mohd Afifi Bahurudin Setambah, Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin, Mazlini Adnan, Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad
Abstract
Open-access reader
Mohd Afifi Bahurudin Setambah, Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin, Mazlini Adnan, Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad
Abstract
Open-access reader
This study aims to examine the validity and reliability of Adventure Based Learning module on Basics Statistics for Institute of Teachers Education students using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Percentage Calculation Method (PCM). The assessment was conducted through the evaluation by 7 experts and 17 students selected via purposive sampling. Three instruments were used for assessment are expert opinion instruments, content validity instruments and reliability module instrument. The result of analysis, CVI and PCM is 0.98 and 83.4%. This module also have 0.71and 0.73 of reliability value. The results of the study prove that the instrument has high validity and good reliability. Therefore, this module has a great potential as a good module. This module is recommended to be used and tested for its effectiveness. The module is also a form of alternative teaching methods to guide lecturer or teacher to add value to students in terms of critical thinking and leadership skills.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study aims to examine the validity and reliability of Adventure Based Learning module on Basics Statistics for Institute of Teachers Education students using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Percentage Calculation Method (PCM). The assessment was conducted through the evaluation by 7 experts and 17 students selected via purposive sampling. Three instruments were used for assessment are expert opinion instruments, content validity instruments and reliability module instrument. The result of analysis, CVI and PCM is 0.98 and 83.4%. This module also have 0.71and 0.73 of reliability value. The results of the study prove that the instrument has high validity and good reliability. Therefore, this module has a great potential as a good module. This module is recommended to be used and tested for its effectiveness. The module is also a form of alternative teaching methods to guide lecturer or teacher to add value to students in terms of critical thinking and leadership skills.
Key concepts: Content validity, Reliability (semiconductor), Adventure, Nonprobability sampling, Validity, Psychology, Index (typography), Mathematics education