2016Clinical LaboratoryRequires access

Evaluation of Cell Counting in Body Fluids: Comparison of Two Automated Hematology Analyzers with Manual Microscopy

Sema Genç, Elmire Dervişoğlu, Dilara Omer, Emine Küçükateş, Beyhan Ömer, Evin Ademoğlu

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Manual microscopic analysis (MMA) of body fluids has been widely replaced by automated systems. The aim of this study was to assess the performances of the Sysmex XN-1000 (XN-1000) and UniCel DxH800 (DxH800) for body fluid analysis and compare their results with MMA and with each other. METHODS: Red blood cell (RBC), WBC and WBC-differential counts of 142 body fluid samples (7 cerebrospinal, 28 pleural, 107 ascitic fluids) were performed using DxH800, XN-1000, and MMA. RESULTS: The within-run and between-days CVs% were lower than 10% for both systems except MONO of DxH800. Both analyzers demonstrated good linearity and minimal carry-over. The comparison of the XN-1000 and DxH800 with manual counting and each other revealed good correlation (r > 0.90 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Automated systems introduce standardized and accurate performances to analyze biologic fluids. They are also beneficial for reducing turn-around time and laboratory costs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Manual microscopic analysis (MMA) of body fluids has been widely replaced by automated systems. The aim of this study was to assess the performances of the Sysmex XN-1000 (XN-1000) and UniCel DxH800 (DxH800) for body fluid analysis and compare their results with MMA and with each other. METHODS: Red blood cell (RBC), WBC and WBC-differential counts of 142 body fluid samples (7 cerebrospinal, 28 pleural, 107 ascitic fluids) were performed using DxH800, XN-1000, and MMA. RESULTS: The within-run and between-days CVs% were lower than 10% for both systems except MONO of DxH800. Both analyzers demonstrated good linearity and minimal carry-over. The comparison of the XN-1000 and DxH800 with manual counting and each other revealed good correlation (r > 0.90 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Automated systems introduce standardized and accurate performances to analyze biologic fluids. They are also beneficial for reducing turn-around time and laboratory costs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Manual microscopic analysis (MMA) of body fluids has been widely replaced by automated systems. The aim of this study was to assess the performances of the Sysmex XN-1000 (XN-1000) and UniCel DxH800 (DxH800) for body fluid analysis and compare their results with MMA and with each other. METHODS: Red blood cell (RBC), WBC and WBC-differential counts of 142 body fluid samples (7 cerebrospinal, 28 pleural, 107 ascitic fluids) were performed using DxH800, XN-1000, and MMA. RESULTS: The within-run and between-days CVs% were lower than 10% for both systems except MONO of DxH800. Both analyzers demonstrated good linearity and minimal carry-over. The comparison of the XN-1000 and DxH800 with manual counting and each other revealed good correlation (r > 0.90 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Automated systems introduce standardized and accurate performances to analyze biologic fluids. They are also beneficial for reducing turn-around time and laboratory costs.

Key concepts: Hematology analyzer, Body fluid, Cell counting, Biomedical engineering, Nuclear medicine, Medicine, Pathology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Cell Counting in Body Fluids: Comparison of Two Automated Hematology Analyzers with Manual Microscopy — Research Paper | ScholarLens