2015Unpublished venueRequires access

SURFACTANT AND SURFACTANT-POLYMER FLOODING FOR LIGHT OIL: A GUM ARABIC APPROACH

Oluwaseun Ayodele Taiwo, Olalekan Olafuyi

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Literatures show that 40% to 55% of oil reserves are usually left insitu after primary and secondary recovery processes such as water flooding. This remaining reserve has to be recovered by Enhanced Oil Recovery process. Surfactant-Polymer flooding is one of the viable Enhanced Oil Recovery processes for recovering additional by lowering the interfacial tension between the oil and water and reducing water mobility. In this research, two sets of experiments were performed. First, the optimum surfactant concentration was determined through surfactant polymer flooding using a range of surfactant (Sodium Dodecyl sulphate, SDS) concentration of 0.1% to 0.6% and 15% of polymer (gum Arabic). Secondly, another set of experiments to determine the optimum flow rate for surfactant flooding was performed. The result of the first set of experiment shows a range of oil recovery of 59% to 76% for water flooding and a range of 11.64% to 20.02% additional oil recovery for surfactant Polymer flooding for a range of surfactant flow rate of surfactant concentration of 0.1% t0 0.6%. For the second sets of experiments, a range of oil recovery of 64% to 68% for water flooding and a range of 15% to 24% additional oil recovery for surfactant flooding for a range of surfactant flow rate of surfactant flow rate of 1cc/min to 6cc/min. The Optimum surfactant flow rate resulting in the highest oil recovery for the chosen core dimension and parameter is 3cc/min.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Literatures show that 40% to 55% of oil reserves are usually left insitu after primary and secondary recovery processes such as water flooding. This remaining reserve has to be recovered by Enhanced Oil Recovery process. Surfactant-Polymer flooding is one of the viable Enhanced Oil Recovery processes for recovering additional by lowering the interfacial tension between the oil and water and reducing water mobility. In this research, two sets of experiments were performed. First, the optimum surfactant concentration was determined through surfactant polymer flooding using a range of surfactant (Sodium Dodecyl sulphate, SDS) concentration of 0.1% to 0.6% and 15% of polymer (gum Arabic). Secondly, another set of experiments to determine the optimum flow rate for surfactant flooding was performed. The result of the first set of experiment shows a range of oil recovery of 59% to 76% for water flooding and a range of 11.64% to 20.02% additional oil recovery for surfactant Polymer flooding for a range of surfactant flow rate of surfactant concentration of 0.1% t0 0.6%. For the second sets of experiments, a range of oil recovery of 64% to 68% for water flooding and a range of 15% to 24% additional oil recovery for surfactant flooding for a range of surfactant flow rate of surfactant flow rate of 1cc/min to 6cc/min. The Optimum surfactant flow rate resulting in the highest oil recovery for the chosen core dimension and parameter is 3cc/min.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Literatures show that 40% to 55% of oil reserves are usually left insitu after primary and secondary recovery processes such as water flooding. This remaining reserve has to be recovered by Enhanced Oil Recovery process. Surfactant-Polymer flooding is one of the viable Enhanced Oil Recovery processes for recovering additional by lowering the interfacial tension between the oil and water and reducing water mobility. In this research, two sets of experiments were performed. First, the optimum surfactant concentration was determined through surfactant polymer flooding using a range of surfactant (Sodium Dodecyl sulphate, SDS) concentration of 0.1% to 0.6% and 15% of polymer (gum Arabic). Secondly, another set of experiments to determine the optimum flow rate for surfactant flooding was performed. The result of the first set of experiment shows a range of oil recovery of 59% to 76% for water flooding and a range of 11.64% to 20.02% additional oil recovery for surfactant Polymer flooding for a range of surfactant flow rate of surfactant concentration of 0.1% t0 0.6%. For the second sets of experiments, a range of oil recovery of 64% to 68% for water flooding and a range of 15% to 24% additional oil recovery for surfactant flooding for a range of surfactant flow rate of surfactant flow rate of 1cc/min to 6cc/min. The Optimum surfactant flow rate resulting in the highest oil recovery for the chosen core dimension and parameter is 3cc/min.

Key concepts: Pulmonary surfactant, Enhanced oil recovery, Polymer, Chemistry, Oil in place, Chromatography, Surface tension, Flooding (psychology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SURFACTANT AND SURFACTANT-POLYMER FLOODING FOR LIGHT OIL: A GUM ARABIC APPROACH — Research Paper | ScholarLens