The Effect of Varying Injection Volumes of Surfactant and Polymer on Oil Recovery
Bo Hyun Chon, Sung Bum Jang
Abstract
Bo Hyun Chon, Sung Bum Jang
Abstract
Surfactant-polymer flooding, a kind of chemical flooding to produce residual oil after waterflood, is designed to increase additional oil recovery from the reservoir. In this study, a laboratory surfactantpolymer flooding experiment was performed to investigate the effect of injection volume of each solution on the oil recovery. A series of surfactant-polymer flooding experiments have been performed to find the optimal recovery efficiency condition. When a surfactant and polymer combination is injected progressively into the reservoir through injection wells the slug moves towards the production well by water drive. In these processes, several interactions between the surfactant and reservoir fluids (crude oil, brine, etc.) such as the creation of a microemulsion phase, adsorption to the rock, wettability alteration, and reduction of interfacial tension occur because of the injection [1,2]. The surfactant helps oil recovery through oil solubilization and mobilization. The injection of a surfactant lowers the interfacial tension between crude oil and formation water and decreases the capillary forces inside the pore. The surfactant is dissolved in either water or oil at the reservoir to form a microemulsion, which forms an oil bank [3]. The formation of an oil bank and subsequent maintenance of sweep efficiency and pressure gradient by injection of a polymer and chase water increase the oil recovery significantly [4-6]. The polymer controls water-oil mobility ratio to achieve a favorable value such that the injected fluid does not bypass the displaced fluid. By adding polymer to water, the viscosity of water is increased and aqueous phase permeability is decreased. The reduction of water mobility improves the displacement conditions for increasing the oil recovery. The phase behavior test was carried out to observe the conditions required to generate a microemulsion system between surfactant and crude oil. A combination of a 2.5 wt% surfactant solution with 1.5 wt% of salinity was found to be optimal for injection experiments. In the surfactant-polymer flooding test, approximately 0.6 pore volume (PV) of slug was injected into the core. The injected volumes of the surfactant and polymer were varied in each test. The oil recovery after water flooding by the surfactant-polymer injection ranged from 13.6% to 28.6%. The highest oil recovery of 28.6% was obtained by injecting 0.1 PV of surfactant and 0.5 PV of polymer.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Surfactant-polymer flooding, a kind of chemical flooding to produce residual oil after waterflood, is designed to increase additional oil recovery from the reservoir. In this study, a laboratory surfactantpolymer flooding experiment was performed to investigate the effect of injection volume of each solution on the oil recovery. A series of surfactant-polymer flooding experiments have been performed to find the optimal recovery efficiency condition. When a surfactant and polymer combination is injected progressively into the reservoir through injection wells the slug moves towards the production well by water drive. In these processes, several interactions between the surfactant and reservoir fluids (crude oil, brine, etc.) such as the creation of a microemulsion phase, adsorption to the rock, wettability alteration, and reduction of interfacial tension occur because of the injection [1,2]. The surfactant helps oil recovery through oil solubilization and mobilization. The injection of a surfactant lowers the interfacial tension between crude oil and formation water and decreases the capillary forces inside the pore. The surfactant is dissolved in either water or oil at the reservoir to form a microemulsion, which forms an oil bank [3]. The formation of an oil bank and subsequent maintenance of sweep efficiency and pressure gradient by injection of a polymer and chase water increase the oil recovery significantly [4-6]. The polymer controls water-oil mobility ratio to achieve a favorable value such that the injected fluid does not bypass the displaced fluid. By adding polymer to water, the viscosity of water is increased and aqueous phase permeability is decreased. The reduction of water mobility improves the displacement conditions for increasing the oil recovery. The phase behavior test was carried out to observe the conditions required to generate a microemulsion system between surfactant and crude oil. A combination of a 2.5 wt% surfactant solution with 1.5 wt% of salinity was found to be optimal for injection experiments. In the surfactant-polymer flooding test, approximately 0.6 pore volume (PV) of slug was injected into the core. The injected volumes of the surfactant and polymer were varied in each test. The oil recovery after water flooding by the surfactant-polymer injection ranged from 13.6% to 28.6%. The highest oil recovery of 28.6% was obtained by injecting 0.1 PV of surfactant and 0.5 PV of polymer.
Key concepts: Pulmonary surfactant, Enhanced oil recovery, Surface tension, Petroleum engineering, Residual oil, Polymer, Oil in place, Chemistry