2014Geosystem EngineeringRequires access

Surfactant–polymer flooding characteristics for heavy oil recovery with varying injection volumes of surfactant and polymer

Sung Bum Jang, Bo Hyun Chon

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

A laboratory surfactant–polymer flooding experiment was performed to improve the recovery of heavy oil. The surfactant phase behavior tests and a series of flooding experiments were conducted to find the best and optimal additional oil recovery condition after water flooding using a surfactant–polymer slug. Through the phase behavior tests, it was found that a combination of a 2.5 wt% surfactant solution with 1.5 wt% of salinity was the optimal for injection experiments. In the surfactant–polymer flooding, the combination of injected volume which was 0.6 pore volume (PV) of combined slugs of surfactant and polymer was varied in each test. The additional oil recovery obtained by the surfactant–polymer flooding after water flooding ranged from 13.6% to 28.6%. With the same total volume of the surfactant and polymer, the oil recovery decreased as the volume of polymer increased when the volume of polymer was lesser than the volume of surfactant; however, the oil recovery increased with increase in the volume of the polymer when the volume of the polymer was greater than or equal to the volume of the surfactant. The highest oil recovery of 28.6% was obtained by injecting 0.1 PV of surfactant and 0.5 PV of polymer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A laboratory surfactant–polymer flooding experiment was performed to improve the recovery of heavy oil. The surfactant phase behavior tests and a series of flooding experiments were conducted to find the best and optimal additional oil recovery condition after water flooding using a surfactant–polymer slug. Through the phase behavior tests, it was found that a combination of a 2.5 wt% surfactant solution with 1.5 wt% of salinity was the optimal for injection experiments. In the surfactant–polymer flooding, the combination of injected volume which was 0.6 pore volume (PV) of combined slugs of surfactant and polymer was varied in each test. The additional oil recovery obtained by the surfactant–polymer flooding after water flooding ranged from 13.6% to 28.6%. With the same total volume of the surfactant and polymer, the oil recovery decreased as the volume of polymer increased when the volume of polymer was lesser than the volume of surfactant; however, the oil recovery increased with increase in the volume of the polymer when the volume of the polymer was greater than or equal to the volume of the surfactant. The highest oil recovery of 28.6% was obtained by injecting 0.1 PV of surfactant and 0.5 PV of polymer.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A laboratory surfactant–polymer flooding experiment was performed to improve the recovery of heavy oil. The surfactant phase behavior tests and a series of flooding experiments were conducted to find the best and optimal additional oil recovery condition after water flooding using a surfactant–polymer slug. Through the phase behavior tests, it was found that a combination of a 2.5 wt% surfactant solution with 1.5 wt% of salinity was the optimal for injection experiments. In the surfactant–polymer flooding, the combination of injected volume which was 0.6 pore volume (PV) of combined slugs of surfactant and polymer was varied in each test. The additional oil recovery obtained by the surfactant–polymer flooding after water flooding ranged from 13.6% to 28.6%. With the same total volume of the surfactant and polymer, the oil recovery decreased as the volume of polymer increased when the volume of polymer was lesser than the volume of surfactant; however, the oil recovery increased with increase in the volume of the polymer when the volume of the polymer was greater than or equal to the volume of the surfactant. The highest oil recovery of 28.6% was obtained by injecting 0.1 PV of surfactant and 0.5 PV of polymer.

Key concepts: Pulmonary surfactant, Polymer, Volume (thermodynamics), Enhanced oil recovery, Chromatography, Materials science, Oil in place, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Surfactant–polymer flooding characteristics for heavy oil recovery with varying injection volumes of surfactant and polymer — Research Paper | ScholarLens