2005•TSpace (University of Toronto)Open access

Three dimensional endometrial volume versus endometrial thicknessmeasurement in prediction of IVF/ICSI outcome

Mona M. Aboulghar, Hesham Gaber Al-Inany, Mohamed A. Aboulghar, Gamal I. Serour, Ragaa Mansour, Yehia M. Amin, Ahmed M Abou-Setta

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the role of estimating endometrial volume and it's correlation with endometrial thickness, on the day of hCG, in prediction of IVF outcome. Design: A prospective clinical study. Materials and methods: Endometrial volume and endometrial thickness were measured in women undergoing an IVF/ICSI cycle, on the day of HCG, using the 3 D transvaginal ultrasound probe (Sonoace 9900 Medison -Kretz , korea). Patients were divided according to endometrial volume calculated into 3 subgroups; < 2ml, 2-4ml, and >4 ml, as well as according to endometrial thickness into 3 groups; <8mm, 8-12mm and >12mm. Pregnancy rates were compared between all groups. Results: The study included 103 women with no significant difference in background characteristics between all subgroups. The pregnancy rates between the three groups of endometrial volume; <2ml, 2-4ml, and >4 ml was; 42%, 36% and 48% respectively. Pregnancy rates between the three groups of endometrial thickness was 25%, 40% and 50 % for <8mm, 8-12and >12mm respectively. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rates between all groups in relation to both endometrial volume and endometrial thickness. Conclusion: Endometrial volume on day of hCG is not a better predictor than endometrial thickness for determining outcome of IVF/ICSI cycles.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To investigate the role of estimating endometrial volume and it's correlation with endometrial thickness, on the day of hCG, in prediction of IVF outcome. Design: A prospective clinical study. Materials and methods: Endometrial volume and endometrial thickness were measured in women undergoing an IVF/ICSI cycle, on the day of HCG, using the 3 D transvaginal ultrasound probe (Sonoace 9900 Medison -Kretz , korea). Patients were divided according to endometrial volume calculated into 3 subgroups; < 2ml, 2-4ml, and >4 ml, as well as according to endometrial thickness into 3 groups; <8mm, 8-12mm and >12mm. Pregnancy rates were compared between all groups. Results: The study included 103 women with no significant difference in background characteristics between all subgroups. The pregnancy rates between the three groups of endometrial volume; <2ml, 2-4ml, and >4 ml was; 42%, 36% and 48% respectively. Pregnancy rates between the three groups of endometrial thickness was 25%, 40% and 50 % for <8mm, 8-12and >12mm respectively. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rates between all groups in relation to both endometrial volume and endometrial thickness. Conclusion: Endometrial volume on day of hCG is not a better predictor than endometrial thickness for determining outcome of IVF/ICSI cycles.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To investigate the role of estimating endometrial volume and it's correlation with endometrial thickness, on the day of hCG, in prediction of IVF outcome. Design: A prospective clinical study. Materials and methods: Endometrial volume and endometrial thickness were measured in women undergoing an IVF/ICSI cycle, on the day of HCG, using the 3 D transvaginal ultrasound probe (Sonoace 9900 Medison -Kretz , korea). Patients were divided according to endometrial volume calculated into 3 subgroups; < 2ml, 2-4ml, and >4 ml, as well as according to endometrial thickness into 3 groups; <8mm, 8-12mm and >12mm. Pregnancy rates were compared between all groups. Results: The study included 103 women with no significant difference in background characteristics between all subgroups. The pregnancy rates between the three groups of endometrial volume; <2ml, 2-4ml, and >4 ml was; 42%, 36% and 48% respectively. Pregnancy rates between the three groups of endometrial thickness was 25%, 40% and 50 % for <8mm, 8-12and >12mm respectively. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rates between all groups in relation to both endometrial volume and endometrial thickness. Conclusion: Endometrial volume on day of hCG is not a better predictor than endometrial thickness for determining outcome of IVF/ICSI cycles.

Key concepts: Medicine, Gynecology, Endometrium, Pregnancy, Pregnancy rate, Significant difference, Obstetrics, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Three dimensional endometrial volume versus endometrial thicknessmeasurement in prediction of IVF/ICSI outcome — Research Paper | ScholarLens